So, Gauke – what about the many people who need Universal Credit, but can’t use computers or online systems at all?

While we’re on the subject of Universal Credit:

Readers of this site will know I’ve regularly uploaded stories about people with learning and literacy difficulties, and other access issues, who are not able to use computers. It’s an issue noted by many. I’m working on another example of such a situation for a Universal Credit applicant at the moment.

The fact is that people in these situations will be utterly excluded from Universal Credit without support to apply and to manage their accounts.

Support is difficult to find – and can be almost impossible to find in some parts of the country (I know this, because I’ve tried). Planned jobcentre closures around the country will exclude people with access issues even further.

Perhaps Mr Gauke can expand on his plans there.

Universal Credit advance payments fix nothing. They’re just loans – and ANOTHER debt for people who have no money

Getting very sick of Tory claims that Universal Credit advance payments solve the serious financial problems caused by the mandatory six weeks (it’s often longer) that people must wait for their first Universal Credit payment. This claim is a total fudge.

Let’s say this loud and clear: Universal Credit advance payments are LOANS. They must be repaid (you can read full details of the Universal Credit advance payment system on the CAB site). They’re not much-needed extras. They’re advances on people’s Universal Credit money and must be repaid out of people’s benefits.

That means that the DWP claws the money back when people’s Universal Credit claims are up and running. The DWP deducts advance payment loan money from people’s benefits at source. Those deductions mean that for months, people who were already in hardship (people who receive advance payments are in hardship by definition) get a smaller Universal Credit payment than they were expecting.

I’ve posted an example at the top of this article – an advance payment deduction notice from the Universal Credit journal of a Croydon/Colchester claimant I wrote about yesterday.

There’s another issue. The DWP makes mistakes with repayment totals – mistakes which cause people a great deal of stress and which they must try and sort out using Universal Credit’s unreliable online systems. For example: the woman who is paying back the advance payment in the notice above got a notice in her Universal Credit journal this year which said the DWP would deduct £528 that month. You can imagine how she felt when she saw that notice in her online account. She wasn’t even liable for payments listed in the notice:

When this sort of thing happens, people must spend ages on the phone to the DWP and online trying to sort the problem out – and trying to make sure, in this case, that the Universal Credit payment that month wasn’t £528 short. That deduction would have been a disaster. People who struggle to use online systems have no chance at all when these many mistakes happen. I’ve written in detail about problems JSA and Income Support claimants had and still have with DWP loan deductions. Some deductions put people in real hardship.

Let’s not forget either that often people who need advance Universal Credit payments already have other debts because of extra costs heaped on them by welfare reform – council tax debts and court costs, rent arrears and plenty more. The young woman in yesterday’s article had serious council tax and court debts, and tax credit repayment demands in the past two years. A deduction for a Universal Credit advance payment loan quickly becomes just another debt problem. Advance payments don’t solve problems caused by that six (and more) weeks that Universal Credit claimants must endure with no money.

All a Universal Credit advance payment does is push shortfall problems back for a short time – ie, until after Tory party conference is over and attention has moved from Universal Credit.

Does my head in, this. Just pay people their Universal Credit entitlement from the day they make their claim and be done with it. Any other so-called “fix” is garbage.

Universal Credit: You must look for work in Colchester by calling Croydon jobcentre. #wtf #IAmLostHere

Another example of Universal Credit lunacy:

I’m speaking with a young Universal Credit claimant who lives in Colchester BUT must carry out benefit compliance activities through Croydon jobcentre. Instructions for her work-related activities come from Croydon jobcentre. She must participate in work-focused “telephone appointments” with Croydon jobcentre from her flat in Colchester.

This is ludicrous. This woman has to look for work in Colchester by calling Croydon jobcentre.

Wtf.

This arrangement has yielded no results as far as finding work goes.

Which is hardly surprising. Croydon jobcentre surely knows next to nothing about Colchester’s employment scene (I’ve been to meetings at Croydon jobcentre and have to say they seemed to struggle with things even in Croydon). Colchester is 72 miles, two hours and several overpriced train journeys from Croydon according to gmaps and the national rail planner. Finding work locally takes local knowledge. People need a local jobcentre. Ironically enough, they need local jobcentres more than ever as Universal Credit is rolled out. Universal Credit is supposed to be a world-beating online benefits-and-job-finding experience, but there are so many problems with it that people inevitably want and need face-to-face help. They don’t trust the DWP to give quick answers or help online.

This sort of convoluted “telephone appointments from elsewhere” situation must affect people all over the place. It apparently came about because Colchester doesn’t have full Universal Credit and won’t until April 2018. This woman made her initial Universal Credit claim at Croydon (a monumental headache in itself. She went weeks without money). Then, she moved to Colchester for cheaper housing. Her Universal Credit claim remained in Croydon, because Colchester can’t manage her claim. Continue reading