Protest today: stop criminalisation of sex workers. Safety first.

From the English Collective of Prostitutes:

Protest today against raids, evictions of sex workers and criminalisation.
Walkers Court, Soho
Wednesday 26 February, 11am-12pm

A motion by MEP Mary Honeyball to criminalise sex workers’ clients is being voted on in Europe today – Wednesday 26 February.

Lobby your MEP TODAY – Information from the International Committee for the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe here and model letter here:

Additionally, on 3 March, the All Party Parliamentary Group on Prostitution reports and is likely to recommend criminalisation of clients.

Criminalising clients will not stop prostitution, nor will it stop the criminalisation of women.  But it will make it more dangerous and stigmatising for sex workers.

Mass police raids last December against sex workers in Soho have thrown scores of women out of the relative safety of their flats. Premises were closed using laws promoted by Labour women ministers in the name of “gender equality”[i]. But where was the feminist outrage when women were dragged handcuffed in their underwear onto the streets? False claims about trafficking have been used to justify the crackdown.  If the police get away with attacking sex workers in Soho who have such strong and visible support, then arrests and illegality against those of us who work on the street will escalate.

Cuts, benefit sanctions, rising poverty and homelessness have forced more women, particularly mothers, into prostitution. Do feminist politicians have a thought for how we’ll feed our children if they further criminalise prostitution?

Sex workers are fighting the Soho closures. One appeal has been won but other flats remain closed. Local people have rallied to support because they fear the closures are to make way for the gentrification of historic Soho.

Consenting sex is not a crime; we demand the decriminalisation of prostitution. New Zealand decriminalised in 2003 and sex workers report feeling safer and more able to demand their rights. Why not here?

Big society: in Skelmersdale’s dreams

Hazel Scully

Hazel Scully

Last week, I went to Skelmersdale to talk about David Cameron’s ‘big society’ ideas with council tenants Ted and Hazel Scully, and Sandra Porter. I spent time with them last year as well.

Cameron’s ‘big society’ concept is as hard to grasp as it is to buy into. It’s centered on the notions that people will volunteer to provide public services in place of the state and that residents should drive local council spending and direction.

Phrases like ‘community empowerment’ and ‘people power’ guff through big society rhetoric. There are already training courses (complete with hefty price tags) for government and third-sector officers who, presumably, can’t picture big society themselves.

The thing is – none of it matters a damn. Neither ‘community empowerment’ nor ‘people power’ will make it past rhetoric under Cameron’s administration. The realities of Tory rule in local government are vicious service cuts and a chilling detachment from people who need public services. There is no engagement. There is no consultation with poorer communities. Funding is cut and services eliminated without a word of discussion with service users and providers.

We’ve focused on this for several years at the Tory Hammersmith and Fulham and Barnet councils. Let’s spend some time now in Skelmersdale – a working-class town in the Conservative West Lancashire borough:

—–

Skelmersdale is a small (pop 38,000), Labour-voting new town that was built in the early 1960s to rehouse families from Liverpool estates.

Skem’s sprawling green fields and bright new estates drew the young families crowd in droves: Skem local Theresa Mackin, for example, made the move from Liverpool 44 years ago ‘because it was green, and I got a house [instead of a flat].’

‘We felt like films stars, to have this new house when we just got married,’ says Barry Nolan, a plumber and local councillor who moved from Bootle to Skem in 1966.

Ted and Hazel Scully, and Sandra Porter were also impressed. Ted worked as a builder when he and Hazel moved to the Firbeck and Findon estate in Skem 35 years ago. He and Hazel had young children, and they liked Skem’s green fields and sense of community. There were new schools for the kids and a decent standard of living for a family on a builder’s wage.

They also believed that council tenancy was synonymous with security.

Alas – all that has changed.

For the past three years, Firbeck and Findon tenants have been battling council plans to demolish their homes. Their Tory-led borough council wants to demolish the Firbeck and Findon estate, build plush apartments for private sale in its place and move tenants like the Scullies and Porter to homes on less lucrative land (Firbeck and Findon is right next to Skem town centre and the green (if presently unkempt) banks of the River Tawd).

The tenants first heard of the plans in 2007, when they got letters from the council alerting them to the forthcoming demolition. Not a single councillor came to tell them about the plans in person. No meetings with residents – some of whom had lived in their homes for nearly 40 years – were scheduled. Hazel Scully describes the news as “a complete shock. We hadn’t heard anything from the council.” (My own calls to West Lancashire Conservatives have gone unreturned for a year).

It was up to residents to defend their homes. Scully sniggers when we talk about community empowerment: for her, empowerment has meant spending her retirement acquiring an in-depth knowledge of council operations.

She and Porter have written a stack of letters, taken petitions around town, joined tenants’ groups and learned how to bail up councillors and St Modwen’s senior managers (St Modwen’s is the council’s private housing development partner) at meetings, in the street and/or whenever their paths sync. They’ve learned to read council files, shadow key political players and patrol their estate for anyone who looks like they’re planning to swing a wrecking-ball.

‘The council said – don’t worry, bulldozers aren’t coming over the hill in the morning… but nobody believes the council,’ Scully says.

Indeed. Here’s Hazel Scully on community empowerment (she starts with a few words on tenants’ concerns about George Osborne’s spending review):

Early in August 2010, David Cameron scared a whole strata when he said secure council tenancy was no longer a right.

I thought about this a lot as I walked around Skem. The likes of Hazel Scully and Sandra Porter don’t see council tenancy – or lifelong council tenancy – as a right, exactly. They see council tenancy as a deal. Continue reading

Standing by

View of Skem

View of Skem from Tawd valley park

Three months ago, we went to West Lancashire town Skelmersdale to talk to council tenants about their fight to stay in flats that were due for demolition. Here we are in February, and nothing much has changed:

Skelmersdale council tenants on the Firbeck and Findon estate still don’t know if their homes will be demolished as part of Tory West Lancashire borough council plans to upgrade rundown Skelmersdale town centre.

As readers of the November article will know, the council believed that the upgrade should include a wholesale flattening of Firbeck and Findon estate, and a replacing of it, and its working class occupants, with plush new apartments for private sale to the better heeled. Firbeck and Findon residents would be dispatched to outlying West Lancashire estates where, presumably, they’d better complement the tone.

‘We’ve heard nothing [since November],’ longtime Firbeck and Findon tenant Hazel Scully says. ‘It’s nearly three and a half years [since the council announced its plans to demolish the estate] that we’ve been waiting [for a final decision on demolition]. There are old people who have lived here for years. There are disabled people here. Nobody knows what is going to happen to their homes. It’s a terrible way to live.’

Back in November, the council told us that it couldn’t make a final decision about demolishing Firbeck and Findon until government decided whether to grant Tesco and Everton FC permission to build a new retail centre and stadium in nearby Kirkby. The Skem regeneration project (and its attending Firbeck and Fendon demolition) was unlikely to go ahead if the Kirkby one did: Skem town centre development partner St Modwen’s said it would it would back out of the Skem plans if Kirkby got the go ahead, because a retail and private-apartments-for-sale centre in Skem would not be able to compete with the Kirkby one. Alas for Skem, regeneration based on retail is the only game in town.

The thing is – the government rejected the Tesco and Everton bid late in November 2010, but the council still hasn’t decided whether the Skem development should go ahead, or if Firbeck and Findon will be destroyed.

Scully isn’t hopeful.

Firstly, it seems likely that Tesco and/or Everton – encouraged by local MPs – will resubmit their Kirby proposal, if they haven’t already. ‘If that happens, we don’t know what will happen to the Skem development project.’

Secondly, people in high places are behaving as though the Firbeck and Findon estate has already gone. Basic cosmetic upgrade works that were planned for Firbeck and Findon are not included in the council’s capital programme (the Skem town centre project, which includes the destruction of Firbeck and Findon, is on the programme for 2010-2011), and Scully says that council leader Ian Grant was heard to say that there was ‘no point spending money on Firbeck and Findon for cosmetic purposes if the estate was to be demolished.’

Apparently, Labour councillor Bob Pendleton asked Ian Grant – in no pleasant terms – to clarify that comment at a recent scrutiny meeting, and got nowhere (more on this soon).

For now, all Scully and Firbeck and Findon residents have is a verbal promise from Tory councillors Val Hopley (cabinet member for housing) and (deputy leader) Adrian Owens that they will be told the fate of their homes before anyone else.

‘We don’t want to find out in a newspaper, or a newsletter,’ Scully says. ‘But they [the council cabinet] have closed up. They won’t give us any information.’ She has only one option – to stay in the cabinet’s ear until the information comes through.

Old new towns

Ornament in a house in Skem

Ornament in a house in Skem

West Lancashire’s Skelmersdale (clipped to ‘Skem’ by locals) was designated a new town in the early 1960s. With its green spaces, schools and new estates, it was sold as an attractive option to council tenants living in cramped blocks in nearby Liverpool.

Skem’s fortunes have been mixed. Regeneration and sustainable housing concepts for low income earners require ongoing investment, commitment and imagination. Problems on all three fronts aren’t exactly news.

By the 1980s, Skem was losing on investment and political commitment: in 1985, just 20 years after it was launched, the Skelmersdale development corporation was wound up. New town corporations had been financed by the government, and responsible for town development and maintenance. Each corporation had loans to buy land and establish town facilities.

When the corporations closed, assets like housing and services like maintenance and estate management passed to local councils – where investment, commitment and imaginative development are a lot harder to come by.

Thus we have Skem – a postwar socialist concept adrift in a Tory borough. Poverty is an issue for some Skem locals: fury at their own powerlessness is another.

We spent some time in Skem recently, talking to the locals. The stories start below.

Bare market

Hazel Scully

Hazel Scully

Long time Skelmersdale council housing tenant Hazel Scully is pleased that West Lancashire borough council is planning a facelift for run-down Skelmersdale town centre – there’ll be a new high street, shops, cinema, library, sports centre, swimming pool, housing, and a lovely landscaped park to replace the spooky weedfest along the River Tawd that presently serves as Skelmersdale’s main municipal space.

It is just a pity, says Scully bitterly, that she won’t have much chance to enjoy the improvements.

She and everybody else who lives on the town-centre Firbeck and Findon estates will be removed from view as part of the upgrade. The council wants to demolish the estates, shift the occupants elsewhere in the borough, and build homes for private sale in place of Firbeck and Findon. Continue reading

Cost effective

Murder scene on New Church Farm

A front door on New Church Farm

Gathered round a broken gate on one of the secluded pathways that link New Church Farm estate’s 600 houses are plumber Barry Nolan and housing benefits officer Neil Furey.

Both have lived on this estate for years. Both are also members of the committed, if notoriously messy, Labour group at West Lancashire borough council. Furey is young, a father of two, a socialist, and a churchgoer. He was elected to council in 2008.

Nolan is older, a father of three married daughters, and a still-optimistic veteran of years of Labour and council politics. He’s been a party member for decades and a councillor for two terms, but appears to be at peace.

Anyway – the New Church Farm estate. Built in 1961, New Church Farm was among Skelmersdale new town’s earliest, and most desirable – a roomy spread of 600 brick houses set a short, countrified walk from the then-pleasant banks of the River Tawd. Continue reading

Community game

This Sunday in Skem is on the waterlogged side – pouring rain, puddles and offroad pathways turned to mudpies.

Joe Nelson and SJFL refs

Joe Nelson and SJFL refs.

Joe Nelson, 74, is out in it in a wet coat and steamed-over glasses, as he usually is on Sunday. Nelson is chair of the Skelmersdale Junior Football League, and has been for more than 30 years.

As Nelson says, it’s a commitment – especially on Sunday, which is matchday for junior footballing Skem.

Outside of the new clubhouse that the FA helped build (with a £400,000 donation), hundreds of small footballers between the ages of six and 14 tear around a huge marshy paddock. There are about ten games in progress.

Nelson says that about 1000 kids play over the course of each Sunday, with around 4000 people (kids, families, friends) turning up to the park in total. They’re impressive numbers, especially in action: swarms of brightly-dressed, miniature footballers as far as the eye can see.

Noticeable too is the number of tiny footballers playing to a spectacular standard of finish. Parents on the sideline at one game watch as one little kid, who is standing a good few yards out from goal, curls a near-perfect free kick towards the top left hand corner of the net. The ball sort of hangs in the air, then drops like a falcon. Amazingly, the ginger haired boy in goal is equal to this flightpath. He launches himself into the air, sails towards the ball on a straight anti-gravity horizontal, and swats the ball clear with both hands.

Nelson says the SJFL channels a considerable portion of its income (raised mainly through a weekly tote) into helping Skem kids into skills training events, FA courses and away trips to other teams.

Families, the kids and team managers are keen. Leon Osmond made it from the SJFL all the way to the Everton first team (Everton signed him when he was nine), and Liverpool, Everton and Wigan scouts still stop by SJFL games.

Nelson – an affable, grandfatherly type who has lived in Skem for 37 years and has five children of his own – has mixed feelings about these early-age big-club signings. He prefers to think of football as an entry to community, rather than a means of escaping it.

‘They [the big clubs] are picking them up too early if you ask me. A lot of [our] lads have gone to the likes of the Wigan teams, and some have gone through to the Liverpool setup, but they haven’t progressed as far as Leon.

‘They go to the academy, and then they get to a certain age, and they say “No, sorry, you’re not going to make it…they’re taking their childhood away from them. They can’t play for their [own] clubs once they’re picked up [by the big teams].’  Which isn’t to say he doesn’t understand. ‘If these fellas [football scouts] come up [to a parent] and say “I want your boy to join Liverpool,” what does a parent do?’

Anyway, Nelson says, the SJFL is less for the few than for the majority, which needs to be kept fit and busy and away from – well, boredom, arson, violence and throwing dogshit round the likes of the New Church Farm estate.

‘If you can keep kiddies occupied in the right areas you can keep them out of the wrong areas. [SJFL] kids train two days a week with their teams. The club holds social evenings for the kids and their families. We’re getting floodlights, so they can play at night.’

A lot of Skem sees one point or the other of the exercise. The league’s army of volunteers (organisers, fixtures secretaries, coaches, managers, refs, tote-collectors, cooks in the canteen) is mostly local. Players who stay in Skem as adults stay with the league as referees.

‘We’re lucky to have a good pool of referees. It’s one of the hardest things, because of the abuse that referees take,’ Nelson says. ‘We don’t get that much, but we do get some.’ He laughs. ‘You always get some.’ The coaches and the managers put a lot of work in to improve the [kids’] skills. Nearly every manager we’ve got has been on an [FA] course for the first level of training.’ They’re all cleared to work with kids.

Nelson worries about Skem, although he’s happy here – ‘I think Skem has been left behind a bit. In truth, it hasn’t come along like it might have done.’

Four of his five children still live here. The one who left did so on the strength of football – she was a good player who moved to San Diego with her husband, a trainer and coach. The next family member out of Skem will be Nelson’s granddaughter, who is also a footballer. She’s a 22-year-old who has played for England and joined Everton as a youngster.

‘She’s out in the US, so she’s doing very well out of it. She’s got a two year scholarship, so she’s had a good little run out of it.’ He stands in the rain with us, watching the hundreds of miniature footballers. ‘There’s a lot out there if the opportunity comes along.’