Why is middle class feminism so disinterested in women hit by austerity?

Open Democracy article by me on the group of homelesss young Stratford mothers who have been battling for places to live. These women and their children have been living in Focus E15, a dirty temporary hostel – for years in some cases. They dare to demand something better and they’ve managed to push Newham council to an extent. Theirs has been an extrarodinary fight – and one that is relevant to all of us who must rent. Housing is a crisis issue for most people, unless they’re rich. Yet a campaign to get a face on a banknote is considered monumentally more important than this grassroots campaign by the political class. I’m guessing it’s considered monumentally more important by people who don’t have to worry about finding a place to live.

“Nobody wanted to make an argument for the rights of young single mothers in the anti-welfare era. Media coverage of the women’s problems was intermittent at best. It was certainly intermittent in comparison with reporting of other recent “women’s” campaigns. I think here, as I usually do, of the extraordinary coverage and endless twitter broadcasting gifted to middle-class feminism’s campaign to have Jane Austen’s face printed on a banknote – banknotes that low-income women in Jasmin’s situation struggled mightily to get their hands on from one day to the next. The banknote campaign – and the opportunistic MPs who supported it, like Stella Creasy – was everywhere in the news last year. It never stopped. Women and children who were directly affected by austerity were nowhere. Standing out in the rain with the women at their stall on Saturdays, it was hard not to long for the day when the likes of the young Focus E15 women were thought worthy of blanket, banknote-type coverage for months and months on end. I suspect that day is a long way off. These women are not politically useful to anyone. Labour won’t back them. Labour won’t fight the welfare corner. It also guns for people who say it should. Just after I began to publish stories about the Focus E15 mothers on my blog, Newham council sent a snooty email to say that officers would no longer communicate with me, because I was reflecting the council’s position unfairly.”

Read the rest here.

Focus E15 mothers take their petition for social housing to Boris…

…who of course wasn’t in to see the women. These people never are.

As many people will know, the Focus E15 women are a group of young mothers, classed as homeless, who have been fighting for decent social housing for all. They’ve been trying to convince Newham council and the East Thames housing association to find them decent social housing in London. They are concerned about being pushed into the highly unstable, unaffordable private rental sector. They are also concerned that to beat the benefit cap, Newham council will send them to live miles away in supposedly cheaper towns. That would remove these young mothers from the families and friends who they rely on and who can provide all-important free childcare when the women go into training and work. Continue reading

More #JSA stories from jobcentres: “It’s impossible. You’re trapped.”

In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been attending leafleting sessions outside jobcentres with the Kilburn Unemployed Workers’ Group and talking to people on JSA about their experiences as they sign on. We’ve been talking to people about sanctions, about being spoken down to by staff and having to walk on eggshells or risk being sanctioned, about relying on the jobcentre for JSA payments between short-term, low-paid jobs and about pointless work programme courses. I’ve posted some transcripts from today’s discussions below.

This morning, we were outside the Neasden jobcentre. It was freezing cold and there was a nasty, biting wind and a number of people we spoke to looked cold and shaky because they were not dressed warmly enough for the weather. I know we hear a great deal about life on JSA being a rort and people on benefits enjoying TV and cigarettes and long days lying around in the sun and all the rest of it, but it never looks that great when I see it. People talk about having to go weeks without money and being forced to grovel and fawn to staff to avoid being sanctioned, and about the terror of putting the card into the cash machine and finding that no money comes out because you’ve been sanctioned after all. And in this rubbish weather, they look cold.

This is the punishment you get these days for the crime of being unemployed and not rich. You are utterly powerless. You’re on the receiving end of everything. You have to put up with everyone’s crap. Of course – things are very different if you’re rich and connected. Life generally is very different if you’re rich and connected. Very different. If you’re Chris Huhne, for example, you get your media-class buddies to give you a column at the Guardian when you leave prison. If you’re Maria Miller, you help yourself to £90k from the taxpayer and claim that little earner was totally above board. If you’re Nadhim Zahawi, you charge the taxpayer to heat your horses’ stables. These people genuinely believe that it’s the rest of us who are out of line. That’s the part that really gets me.

Most of the people we spoke to this morning were forced to collect JSA between low-paid and insecure jobs, or to subsidise low-paid and insecure jobs – something that ought to concern everyone who relies on a wage to pay the bills. One of the women, Noreen, talked about finding work on “lucky days.” She meant that she found work by herself on days when her luck was in and she managed to talk to the right people, not because there was any system in place to help her. Pity she doesn’t have as many lucky days as Chris Huhne.

Continue reading

Tell your MP to attend the #WOWdebate: 27 February 11.30am

From DPAC:

The WOW petition debate which has been supported by John McDonnell MP will take place on Thursday 27 February 2014 around 11.30 am at the House of Commons chamber. The WOW petition calls for a cumulative impact assessment of the impact of the government’s welfare reform changes on sick and disabled people.

Please contact your MP to ask them to attend this important debate. You can find your MP’s email details at www.parliament.uk. You can also write to your local MP (find the details by using the Write to your MP tool), tell them what the petition is about and ask them to attend the debate. Or you can email your MP using this automated tool to help you compile and send the email.

You may want to remind your MP that as we are approaching an election in the not too distant future, you will be monitoring to see whether they attend or not on your behalf.

Template letter to send (mainly taken from WOW): Continue reading

Fighting for decriminalisation: talking with the English Collective of Prostitutes

I’ve spent time recently with the English Collective of Prostitutes, talking with the women there about their fight against the criminalisation of sex work.

As readers of this site will know, this is a subject I have some knowledge about. I also feel that we don’t hear enough from sex workers themselves on the topic of decriminalisation. We hear an awful lot from “experts” and interest groups and opinion writers, but not anything like as much as we should from workers themselves. I have never been able to understand why people wouldn’t want to support sex workers in their campaign for decriminalisation and the safest possible working environment. Supporting that campaign does not mean that you support trafficking, which is horrific. It means quite the opposite. It means you support the notion that everyone – everyone – deserves recognition and the protection of the law. So, I’ll soon be posting some of the interviews I’ve done where ECP members talk about the working environment and the rights and protections in law that they rightfully seek. A lot of women do this job and a lot of them are mothers. They need the money. They need a safe working environment in which to get it, especially in this rotten economic environment. Judge that if you will.

I’ll start posting those transcripts in the next few days I think. In the meantime, here is a press release from the ECP about recent raids and attempts to close Soho workplaces.

Press release from the ECP:

“Violence against sex workers is increasing. Tragically, two sex workers have been murdered in London in the past three months. At the same time, the police have stepped up raids, arrests and closures of premises where women are working in relative safety. This is despite senior police officers admitting that: “[police] operations to tackle the trade are “counterproductive” and likely to put the lives of women at risk.”

Eighteen flats in Soho, Central London, have been closed. Most of the women who were evicted are mothers and have now lost their livelihood. Continue reading

Shutting homelessness hostels, then slapping Asbos on rough sleepers. Brilliant.

In the Guardian today, there’s a story about cuts to supported housing – the hostels and housing used and needed by people who’d otherwise be on the streets.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that the loss of this accommodation will mean more people must sleep on the streets:

“Nottinghamshire county council will vote later this month on proposed cuts that will, according to Framework (the Nottinghamshire-based housing association mentioned in the Guardian aticle), result in almost all the homeless and housing support services across the county closing down. As Nottinghamshire’s hostels, and specialist housing support services are decommissioned over the next three years, around 6000 vulnerable clients currently supported by Framework each year – rough sleepers, care-leavers, ex-offenders, addicts and people with complex mental health problems who are not receiving NHS care – will be cast adrift.”

Isn’t that great.

I want to make a further point – that once all those people are cast adrift and forced to sleep rough, they’ll find themselves targeted by the very authorities who shut their hostels. That’s because councils and coppers are going on the offensive as far as rough sleepers are concerned.

Last week, I posted this story about Newham council’s latest gig: slapping Asbo warnings on rough sleepers in Stratford and then bragging about this brand of toughlove. Mayor Robin Wales wrote an entirely charmless piece in the Newham Recorder about his crackdown on rough sleepers round the Stratford Centre. As part of a programme that the council winningly (not) referred to as “a rude awakening for rough sleepers”, the council had handed out Asbo warnings to 28 people who were sleeping out around the mall. The council was being “helped” in this endeavour by the police, the UK Border Agency and Thames Reach.

As I wrote last week, there was a nasty, punitive thread running through Wales’ column. It hit exactly the Clean Up or Piss Off pitch that the likes of Edwina Currie keep aiming for.

“There’s a rough sleeping problem around Stratford centre, Wales said, because there was “easy access to waste food and cardboard,” (he sounded like he was talking about the things that attract rodents in that bit). Rough sleepers who “refuse offers of assistance from us or our partners cannot expect to continue to sleep on our streets,” the mayor said. They could expect Asbos if they tried, it seemed. The council was “offering support to those who will accept it and enforcing the law where necessary,” Wales informed us. “I realise that this is a tough message,” he went on to say, “and that some people will be instinctively unhappy with it.”

Indeed. A lot of us were very unhappy with it. We’re getting unhappier by the day, too. Hitting rough sleepers with Asbos as their accommodation is removed and social housing disappears, and then trying to style that as an example of great local government leadership is an amazingly crappy endeavour. I’ve had word this week too that the mother and baby unit accommodation for homeless young parents at Focus E15 in Newham will definitely close when all current tenants are rehoused. My point here: perhaps keeping that sort of accommodation open would be more of an answer to rough sleeping than issuing rough sleepers with Asbos. The same will surely apply in Nottinghamshire once they’re closed hostels there. What would I know, I suppose.

Meanwhile, campaigners are gearing up to fight Operation Encompass, the Met’s latest wheeze against rough sleepers:

The Metropolitan Police Service has joined forces with Camden, Croydon, Islington, Lambeth, Southwark and Westminster together with UK Border Force, local authorities and other partner agencies to combat begging and rough sleeping across the six London boroughs.”

I’ll be following that one closely. A lot of us are keen to find out exactly how you combat rough sleeping while closing the places where people might sleep. Throwing the book at people seems to be one of the plans. “Support will be offered through support services and making arrests where offences are identified,” the Met informs us in its Operation Encompass press release. Which is interesting. Who knew that arresting people who were trying to shelter from the rain under cardboard was a key route to fixing homelessness. As I say, I would have thought that one of the best ways to fix homelessness would be to find people decent and secure supported housing, rather than shutting that housing down, but now I’m just repeating myself. So – I guess the official take is that it is better for all to hit rough sleepers with an Asbo and push them into someone else’s borough. Or something.

Four people talk about sanctions and the pointlessness of jobcentres

Earlier this week, I spent a morning outside the Kilburn jobcentre with the Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group. The group regularly leaflets at the jobcentre, to let people know that there is help and support available for people who are struggling.

We talked to person after person who was on JSA and signing on. And being sanctioned. The first person we saw was a young man who came out of the jobcentre yelling that he’d just been sanctioned for 13 weeks. He was furious, as well he might be. Thirteen weeks is a hell of a long time to go without money.

He was too angry to talk about that with us in any detail, but we did speak to a lot of other people who had similar experiences. I recorded those discussions and have posted transcripts of those recordings below. I’ll be doing a lot more of this. People need to hear the sorts of things that people on JSA are saying. And I don’t think it will do jobcentres any harm to know that there are journalists out the front of their places asking people what things are like inside.

Because things don’t seem too good at all inside. Just about everyone we spoke with talked about sanctions and appointment mixups and confusing instructions and paperwork, and having to “walk on eggshells” in case anything happened that might lead to a sanction. This part really gets on my nerves. If you’re on JSA, you’re at the mercy of everyone. You’re on the receiving end of everything. People can treat you however they like. And all because you’re unemployed. It’s as though being unemployed has become a hanging offence.

Continue reading

Hoovering cash out of public services: Capita’s How To conference

An amazingly in-your-face titled Capita conference looms for March: it’s called the “Developing Commercialism in Local Government Conference.”

Developing Commercialism in Local Government. That title really is about as blatant as they get. I hardly knew where to spit when I read it. Nobody is even pretending any more. Getting the private sector and a sales “ethos” into the public sector is the name of this game. It’s all about replacing the public service ethos with a commercial one – and outfits like Capita now happily brand their conferences to make that clear.

Back in my day, these private companies used to try and fudge the “aim is to make money out of public services” point a bit. Private companies would attempt to pour oil at our council meetings (I was a union steward representing members whose jobs were threatened by private sector takeovers) with coy phrases like “we just want to help enable public services,” or “we’re only here to assist your council with change management and then we’ll be gone,” and other florid bollocks. Now, we’ve got the likes of Capita turning up at councils with their tongues hanging out and saying point-blank Let’s Develop Commercialism. Read their bumpf and weep. This is the direction that public service “leaders” point themselves in today – “exploring the local drive towards commercialism,” keeping “a keen focus on engendering a commercial culture and overcoming risk aversion,” (hopefully not to the extent that Fred Goodwin did) and pushing heaps and heaps of money at private companies. As those of us who follow these things know, the commercialism of public services is particularly about pushing heaps and heaps of money at companies like Capita. We do keep seeing the same faces at these things.

Continue reading

The real problem with homeless people…they’re attracted to cardboard

This morning, I went to Stratford to report on the Focus E15 young mums‘ attempt to attend Mayor Robin Wales’ proceedings committee. As readers of this blog will know, these young mothers – all classed as homeless and all living in temporary hostel accommodation – have battled for months for secure social housing for themselves and for the rest of us. They wanted to appeal again to Wales for social housing today.

As I arrived, I was handed a copy of this week’s Newham Recorder, which carries a column from Wales about Newham council’s recent crackdown on rough sleepers round the Stratford Centre. As part of a programme that the council charmingly refers to as “a rude awakening for rough sleepers”, Asbo warnings were recently slapped on 28 people who were sleeping out around the mall. The council has been “helped” in this endeavour by the police, the UK Border Agency and Thames Reach.

I found Wales’ column purely extraordinary (you can read the whole thing here). There’s a nasty, punitive thread running through it – a bit like shit through a goose, as the great Justin McKeating would say. It hits exactly the Clean Up or Piss Off pitch that Edwina Currie keeps aiming for. There’s a rough sleeping problem around Stratford centre, Wales says, because there is “easy access to waste food and cardboard,” (he sounds like he’s talking about drawcards for rodents in that bit). Rough sleepers who “refuse offers of assistance from us or our partners cannot expect to continue to sleep on our streets.” They can expect Asbos if they try, it seems. The council is “offering support to those who will accept it and enforcing the law where necessary,” Wales informs us. “I realise that this is a tough message,” he goes on to say, “and that some people will be instinctively unhappy with it.”

Bloody right. I’m one of those people. I bet there are plenty of others. This stuff is appalling. There is nothing remotely forgiving about the piece that Wales has written here. There’s no political context. There’s no detail about the many reasons why people might be trying to shelter from awful weather in cardboard in a walkway and getting pissed to block it all out. There’s nothing at all about the realities of the fallout from this government’s dreadful “welfare reforms” – JSA sanctions, homelessness, severe mental health problems, the loss of hostel housing, being thrown off employment and support allowance and so on and so on and so on. As it happens, I’ve talked with a great many people who are in and out of street homelessness and there’s inevitably a complicated story at the back of it. We need to hear more of these stories and less about Asbos if you ask me. I’ve talked to people with serious mental health conditions who’ve been displaced when their hostel accommodation has been closed. I’ve talked to people who’ve lived in tents while their ESA problems have rolled on and on and they’ve tried to address their serious addiction problems by moving towns. I’ve talked to people who lost their businesses in the recession and ended up unemployed, sanctioned and homeless.

I doubt that Asbos would have sorted those situations out, but it seems that you get councils going for it. And all this in a column from a mayor who Private Eye tells us this week has been using Newham’s repairs and maintenance services to carry out work on his home. This service “undertakes work for non-council tenants and this service is available to any Newham resident,” the council told blogger Mike Law (the story says that Wales paid about £1500 for the work). Which must be great if you have a house and money to pay for its upkeep. It’s probably less exciting if you’re homeless, eating food off the pavement and wrapping yourself in cardboard every night in the Stratford Centre to try and keep warm. There’s something very wrong with all of this. There’s a poisonous inequality inherent in it and the finger of blame is being pointed at people who deserve it least. I think here of the many boarded-up flats on Newham’s Carpenters Estate – homes that sit empty as the council wags a warning finger at 28 people who sleep in a mall and have nowhere to go and may not want to be strongarmed into “specialist support.” Those people may not want to take instruction from mayors who have enough money for their own housing and repairs. They may be sick of seeing the political class come down on the poorest like a shitload of bricks. They may just want decent social housing and paid work, but can’t get either. God knows that is happening everywhere.

Anyway – trying to make that point to the political class is almost impossible now. As I said at the start of this post – this morning, the young women of the Focus E15 housing campaign tried to enter a mayoral proceedings meeting to appeal again to Wales for social housing in the borough. This is a campaign that should interest anyone who isn’t rich and doesn’t own a huge house outright. Without secure social housing, we’re all at the mercy of increasingly merciless private landlords. We’re all looking at short tenancies, badly-maintained flats and skyrocketing rents. But the women have been told that they must take 12-month private lets in the private rental sector, or they’ll will get no more “help” from the council. They wanted to talk to Wales about this again today. Unfortunately, they were told that the meeting was over and that they weren’t allowed in. You’ll see that in this video:

I’d ask the council for a comment on this, except that the council won’t talk to me. That part of things has gone a bit emotional, in a crappy council way. As I wrote here, I can only guess that my earlier stories about the Focus E15 women’s battle for secure social housing and the rotten standards at the temporary hostel they’re living touched a nerve. So, we’ll take what I write as written. Apparently, a press officer turned up later on today to say the mothers should have been let into the mayoral proceedings after all. Pity the proceedings were over.

So. The Focus E15 campaign remains extremely important and will only become more so. These women are pointing up the problems with the private rented sector, the terrible lack of secure social housing and the way that people on benefits and low incomes are treated if they dare to ask for it. Just remember – this is all coming your way, unless you’re rich. Very rich.

Focus E15 young mums’ battle for social housing: an update

Back to Newham now, where the young homeless mothers who’ve been fighting a real battle for secure local social housing have been given an ultimatum by Newham council: they must take 12-month lets in the private rental sector, or they’ll will get no more “help” from the council. The women think if they turn the private-sector lets down, they’ll be considered to have made themselves intentionally homeless. “We have to take them,” the women said on Saturday. “The council says if we don’t, they won’t give us any more help to get housed.” I’d ask the council for a comment on this, except that the press office threw a tantrum a few weeks ago and said it wouldn’t talk to me again. It seems that my earlier stories about the women’s battle for secure social housing and the rotten standards at the hostel they’re living touched some kind of nerve.

Presenting the women with this “short-term private lets” ultimatum is a sneaky move by the council. It breaks the campaign group up by housing the young mothers in far-flung parts of London, away from each other. It also leaves the women and their children very vulnerable to further house moves. In 12 months’ time, when the lets are up, the council can say that the private rents exceed the benefit cap and send the women out of London to live in boroughs where they are not wanted and where there is no work, or family members around to provide childcare. It seems very unlikely that the women will be in private lets in London for the longer term – especially as rents increase and as the benefit cap is lowered even further, as it inevitably will be. If the women have to move again, their kids will have to be moved to new nurseries and schools again. And again and again and again.

This is the problem and future that all renters face – short-term tenancies, skyrocketing rents and no sure place for families to live for more than a few months at a time. That is why the Focus E15 campaign for secure social housing is so important to us all. The Newham quick-fire, private rental solution does not solve a single problem for anyone who must rely on the private rental sector for housing. It does not force the council to build more social housing for all, or to commit to opening up the many boarded-up homes on places like the Carpenters Estate which you can see in the video below. This short-term solution simply breaks up a campaign and shuts down a debate, which is surely the council’s aim.

Anyway. In the video below, you can see some of the many boarded-up flats on Newham’s Carpenters estate and hear the Focus E15 mothers’ views on this:

Residents put up an almighty fight recently to save their flats from council plans to create a UCL campus on the site. Flats on the estate have been boarded up for a very long time though. I asked the council about its plans for those flats and for the estate in general, but as I say, the council refuses point-blank to talk to me about anything. So we’ll have to leave that one hanging and simply look at the video of the boarded-up flats. And make the point again that the real problem here is an absolute lack of will – across the political spectrum – to truly commit to the notion of secure and plentiful social housing for all. Shoving a few campaigners into private lets for a bit won’t change that.