Barnet council workers strike again

Press release from Barnet Unison:

“On Thursday 9 February, hundreds of Barnet council *UNISON members will go on strike.

Barnet council workers are fighting Barnet council plans to mass-outsource council services and jobs to the private sector. The council is proceeding with a £750m “support and customer services project” where a private company will be engaged to deliver services like council estates, finance, human resources, information systems, procurement, revenues and benefits and project management services. Unison estimates job losses of between about 190 and 250 for workers in these areas.

The council is also planning to move adult social services (learning disability and physical and sensory impairment services for adults) into a profit-focused, local authority trading company.

What is happening in Barnet is likely to happen across NHS services – private sector companies fighting to win lucrative, guaranteed contracts to provide public services. These contracts are all funded by the taxpayer.

Up to 70% of Barnet council’s workforce could be transferred to the private sector in little more than 11 months’ time.

For many of Barnet Unison’s members, this will be the fourth day of action in response to the One Barnet Project which seeks to transfer the majority of staff out of the council and develop partnership projects with private companies to deliver services. The total cost of these projects will very likely exceed £2bn, which is why private sector companies are lining up to win contracts with the council.

By agreeing to take action next week, members make an important statement. They want to remain council employees, they want inhouse service bidders to be allowed to compete with private companies, and, most of all, they want to serve the community they are passionate about.

After taking part in the picket line, a group of strikers will help out a local charity. Members want to make it clear that “while they will be withdrawing their labour from the council, they are not withdrawing their commitment to the community they are so proud to serve.”

John Burgess, Barnet Unison branch secretary said

“Doing nothing is not an option for our members. The council is playing high stake risks with our members’, and council taxpayers’, future payments. The council needs to recognise that the One Barnet programme cannot be allowed to continue to expose residents, services and staff to this high risk strategy and expect them to pick up the bill.

Barnet Unison is asking for the One Barnet programme to be put on hold.

*workers in these departments will take action: trading standards & licensing, land charges, planning & development, building control & structures, environmental health, highways strategy, highways network management, highways traffic & development, highways transport & regeneration, strategic planning & regeneration, cemeteries & crematoria, parking services, revenues & benefits, ** housing and social care direct

** Subject to outcome of a strike ballot

Contact: John Burgess, Barnet Unison, on 07738389569 or email: john.burgess@barnetunison.org.uk.

————-


Racist and misogynist: the US welfare reforms we’re copying

Second article in the series I’m doing at False Economy on welfare reform and the failure of the American welfare-to-work programme (the workfare programme that Iain Duncan Smith is pursuing with such enthusiasm here). This second article looks at the sexism and racism that has informed US welfare reform. African-American Wisconsin benefit claimants on the workfare programme had their benefits sanctioned at several times the rate of white claimants. It’s a cruel and biased system.

Leaked private company bidder documents on the Barnet eye

Very interesting post over at Rog T’s (THIS LINK IS NOW BROKEN – SEE REASONS WHY BELOW) – it seems he has been leaked a document which describes the (very) loose process the council is using to choose a private strategic partner for a £290m project. Makes worrying reading, all right. I went through a more selection stringent process when I joined the girl guides.

Will add more as it comes available.

The Barnet bloggers take a risk by publishing this document out – there will be nervous moments as its authenticity is confirmed and the council will hit the roof either way. But the hell with the council – it wouldn’t be the first time questions were asked about its procurement processes. And I know bravery when I see it – I publish this in solidarity with Rog T and will add more as I get my head round the document.

Update 21 January 2012

It would seem that the document’s authenticity has been confirmed:

From Rog’s blog: “At 19.10 last night, I received a letter from Barnet Council legal team. The letter suggested that as the document I published on Thursday concerning the One Barnet tender process was marked confidential, I was not allowed to publish it and must remove it from my website immediately. They also suggested that I may be liable for any legal costs of claims arising from publishing it. As it the letter arrived at such a late hour on a Friday evening as I was going out, I removed the document from my website pending legal advice.”

Will provide more updates as they come through. Bloggers are organising to support Rog AND the public’s right to know how councils like Barnet select private companies for these massively costly private sector contracts. The document Rog T published on his site demonstrated that process of selection/elimination very clearly and that’s why it’s vital that bloggers are supported as they fight to bring details of council deals with private companies into the public domain. Millions are being spent with private companies in this era of so-called austerity and people have a right to know which company gets what and why. This is a big issue and I’ll be supporting Rog all the way on it.

Update: Mr Reasonable has blogged about the issue. He’s right, too, when he says he can’t understand why the council wants to hide documents which describe how councils choose private companies for projects that are worth a fortune. As he says:

“There are 350,000 people in Barnet whose lives will be affected by this outsourcing project [Barnet council’s plan to outsource a swathe of services to one of four companies currently bidding] yet no more than a handful are privy to the detail or involved in the decision making. What is taking place here is wholly undemocratic so it is not in the least bit surprising that people are leaking details and even less surprising that there is a desire to make these leaked documents public. Rather than hassling Roger T perhaps the Council should be spending more time engaging with the residents to explain what the hell they are doing and asking why the staff are so unhappy that they feel the need to leak these documents. Doing long term mega-outsourcing deals without public consensus and scrutiny is a both a disgrace and, in the long term, politically unsustainable.”

Amen.

Update: Mrs Angry has posted a very good blog on the issue as well.

Council cuts – year two

Last update: 24 January 2012 

Over the next three months, councils around the country will begin to agree budgets for 2012. The agreement of these budgets – and the service cuts they entail – will mark the start of the second year of appalling cuts to local government services.

Adult care services, children’s care services, daycentres for people with disabilities, daycentres for the elderly, respite carehomes, libraries, youth centres, youth offices, children’s homes – vital local government services took massive hits around the country in 2011. More will go as the government’s slashing of local government grants continues.

I’m drawing up a list of proposed council cuts around the country, job losses expected and council meetings where cuts proposals will be agreed over the next few months (have also pointed out privatisation threats here and there). Generally, council budgets are agreed in February and March at full council meetings.

Points to note: specifics seem harder to come by than last year. There’s a lot of rhetoric in council documents about departments having to cut costs, but less about actual services that will be lost or shut. That may be because the cuts proposed on those lists drew a lot of lightning last year. When councils named the libraries, daycentres, and carehomes they planned to cut, people publicised that information and organised campaigns around them. It’s a lot harder to campaign around general statements about reducing budgets. Anticuts activists are accusing councils of caginess and they have a point. More on that as things develop.

Job losses will be a real problem. Unemployment is already climbing and estimates show that councils are expecting to make thousands more people redundant this year, often in parts of the country least able to cope (national unemployment is highest in the north east of England, where both the public and private sectors are shedding jobs). That is not good news, with the jobless rate over eight percent already. In the north east of England, unemployment is over 11%.

Another point worth noting is that a lot of councils are (almost pointedly) running public consultation exercises on cuts – they’re crowdsourcing views on services to slash. This may because councils were subject to public and legal pressure last year for failing to consult service users about cuts proposals. It’s probably also a useful way to diffuse anger about cuts – the more a council meets and talks with people, the more often it can ram home the “we have no choice except to cut” line.

Will be adding details for more councils, and adding and changing numbers as things become clearer and more information becomes available.

List:

Anglesey council (h-t @londonhackette)
A total shambles. Run by commissioners appointed by the Welsh government, this council released a bleak budget this week (16 January) which outlined how schools could be hit with 5% cuts, swimming facilities closed and road maintenance budgets slashed.

The linked story also says taxpayers could face a 5% rise in bills this year which may rise to 15% over three years. The council’s commissioners say they must save £4.5m this year and up to £11m over three years. Commissioners say jobs will be lost, although numbers were unclear at the time of writing. Anglesey council also misses out on elections this year – commissioners will be kept in place, it seems, until the council recovers from “stability problems” identified by the Audit Commission. Intriguing.

Budget cut for 2012: £4.5m (£11m over three years)
Job losses: Numbers not known but job losses likely
Threatened services: Services across the council, including schools and leisure services.
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: Full council meeting March 6 2012.

———————

Barnet council:
Our favourite mass-privatising council plans to cut another £43m from budgets by reducing services and introducing higher parking charges, among other initiatives. The linked story says the council will cut £14.5m from adult social care and £9.5m from children’s services.

No matter, presumably, that the council found £750m in 2011 to engage a private partner in a “support and customer services project.” That project will see a private company (possibly Capita) delivering services like council estates, finance, human resources, information systems, procurement, revenues and benefits and project management services. No matter either that hard-hitting reports last year asked serious questions about Barnet council’s ability to manage procurement processes and relationships with the private sector. Look for private companies to do very well out of Barnet council this year. There has always been plenty of money at Barnet council for those who need it least.

Budget cut for 2012: £43m (might be spread over several years)
Job losses: The council says 100. Unison says many more than that if the council pursues its plans to mass-outsource services.
Threatened services: Services across the council, including adult social care and children’s services.
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: Possibly full council meeting January 24 2012.

———–

Birmingham City Council:
The council is consulting on cuts it wants to make to achieve £65m reductions in its 2012-13 budget. The BBC is reporting that could mean the loss of up to 1200 jobs– which would be disastrous for Birmingham. The story says that nearly 2500 jobs were lost in 2011. Major job (and therefore service) losses are expected in areas including A&C home care, CYPF children’s homes,  adult social care residential homes and adoption and fostering, according to Birmingham Unison.

The proposed budget will go before cabinet on 13 February and full council on 28 February.

Budget cut for 2012: £65m
Job losses: 1200
Threatened services: Services across the council, including home care, children’s homes and residential homes.
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: 28 February 2012 at full council meeting.

—————————————–

Blackpool council
The Blackpool Gazette is reporting that there will be considerable service cuts and job losses this year as the council looks for £10m in savings.

Compulsory redundancy figures could be around 100 – which may mean that there are voluntary redundancies on top of that. Unions are predicting losses of at least 200. Last year, the council made cuts to the tune of £27m and shed 750 jobs. That figure included around 350 compulsory redundancies. Over 2011 to 2012, then, the council’s job losses will near 1000. That’s a lot of jobs.

Budget cut for 2012: £10m
Job losses: 100-200
Threatened services: Services across the council? Consultation is ongoing and voluntary redundancies are apparently being sought across the council.
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: February 2012 at full council meeting (tbc).

——————

Bradford council:
One to watch closely. This confusing story suggests that the council intends to both protect and cut frontline services in adult social care. The council says that cuts of £31m will be required to balance books. The story says that departments like adult and community services and children and young people’s services are among those likely to be cuts.

About 600 job losses are expected. Council leader Ian Greenwood says it would be dishonest to say those job losses won’t affect services (and he’s right. It would be). Consultation on proposals (full list here) lasts until 7 February 2012 and the budget will be decided at a full council meeting on Thursday 23 February 2012.

Budget cut for 2012: £31m
Job losses: 600
Threatened services: Across the council.
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: 23 February 2012 at full council meeting.

—————————————–

Bristol city council:
Bristol is consulting on £21m in jobs and services to be cut from April 2012. Anticuts groups say that the council is releasing the bare minimum of information and disguising plans. Battlegrounds this year will include council plans to close or privatise care homes and day centres for the elderly (there’s a list of threatened centres at the end of this post) and to cut £1m from the youth services budget. Job losses of 350 are being touted. Bristol city council will finalise cuts decisions at a full council meeting on 28 February 2012.

Budget cut 2012: £21m
Job losses: 350
Threatened services: youth services, services for the elderly
Date budget and cuts to be agreed on: Council meeting, 28 February 2012

—————————————–

Continue reading