Sick with diabetes? Want to see your GP? Too bad. Get on the work programme. More jobcentre recordings

On the topic of Iain Duncan Smith and the DWP “helping” sick or disabled people into work:

I’ve posted below a recording of a jobcentre adviser shelving a diabetic JSA claimant’s concerns when he says that he is ill, that his blood sugar is high and that he needs to get to his GP. I want to show you how quickly some jobcentre advisers can bat talk of sickness away.

I think this is important. As you will know, there’s a great deal of discussion about Iain Duncan Smith’s plans to push more and more sick or disabled people into work. There’s also a great deal of It’s All Fine bollocks coming from government and the DWP about the sort of support that sick or disabled benefit claimants receive from the DWP as they look for work, or are pushed into work (“jobseekers now have access to dedicated Work Coaches, who are trained to provide tailored support specific to their individual needs,” the DWP waffled in an email to me when I recently asked the department about jobcentre support for disabled claimants).

I hope that the recording on this page demonstrates the realities of some of this “tailored support.” The truth is there are times when advisers seem pretty indifferent to a claimant’s problems, or to tailoring a jobcentre meeting to a person’s individual needs. (To be fair, I suspect that many advisers are too busy to find time for this “tailoring.” Advisers have told me as much: “I used to see about five people a day. Now I see about 15.”). I think that the DWP has one aim and one aim only: to push people into voluntary work, or onto work programme courses. Everything else comes second – including health, I suspect. That message came over loud and clear at the meeting I am talking about. The JSA claimant’s ill-health was canvassed (briefly), but he was absolutely not excused from the meeting until the adviser had made a very considerable effort to sign him up for voluntary work and courses.

The JSA claimant in this post is an older man (he’s 52) who has a learning difficulty and is diabetic, as I say. He injects insulin three times a day (I’ve been to his flat many times and seen his fridge full of insulin). As soon as we arrived at this jobcentre meeting, he told the adviser that he felt unwell because of his diabetes. He certainly seemed unwell: his face looked sweaty and greasy, and he was irritable. He had recently been sick with the flu. The adviser clearly had doubts about this story – or, at least, decided that this man’s ill-health wasn’t as big a priority as signing him up for voluntary work. This claimant had cut the previous week’s appointment with the same adviser short for a similar reason. He told me that he’d been ill for a while. (We went to his GP’s surgery to make an appointment after this jobcentre meeting). The adviser instructed the claimant to manage his food intake properly in future. Then, she got down to the real business of the meeting (and presumably of the DWP): to push this man into signing up for voluntary work, or the work programme:

Transcript:

JCP (Jobcentre Plus Adviser): “Hi, are you all right?

Claimant: Not too good.

JCP? Not too good?

Claimant: Not too well.

JCP: Oh. Okay.

Claimant: Not feeling very well at all.

JCP: Oh. The diabetes, you mean. You had lunch?

Claimant: Not yet, no. I will have to shortly soon.

JCP: What time do you normally eat then?

Claimant: Sometimes, it’s like one, or two, or three o’clock, like.

JCP: Aren’t you supposed to stick to a bit more regular…?

Claimant: Yeah. I should have…shortly.

JCP: [looking at me] Yeah, okay…Is this the same lady as last week?

Me: Yeah… hello [Recording edited here to remove a name]

JCP: Right, so how long have I got then?

Claimant: Not very long.

Me: Do you want to get to the doctor?

Claimant: I have to go to the doctor shortly, anyway. And check my sugar, because it is so high.

JCP: Right, right…okay. Because we booked it [this appointment] because we didn’t have much time on Friday (sic), but obviously, if it’s the same sort of scenario…

Claimant: [unclear] Hyper…hyper…it comes just like that. Sometimes, it just comes, you know.

JCP: Yeah. You have to stick to regular mealtimes…you know that, don’t you. You have to stick to really regular times to eat, otherwise you’re going to get issues… Right. So we haven’t got much time. You sign on next week… Did you have any more thinking about doing the voluntary work to help you? To [get] paid jobs?”

————-

That was basically it as far talk about the illness went. The interview carried on for about half an hour from there. You can read about the rest of that session here. You’ll see from the longer article that the adviser was pretty relentless in her attempts to sign this man up for voluntary work and the work programme. There were points where I thought the interview seemed almost designed to increase the stress levels of someone with a diabetic illness: the adviser pushed applications forms for courses across the desk and insisted on finding and giving us the address of a work programme provider so that we could visit the course site in advance. As I say, the adviser kept that line going for quite some time before finally saying that this JSA claimant could leave.

You see my point. This is how the DWP’s “tailored support” for sick or disabled people can look on the ground. The health problems are put to one side. The priorities are clearly elsewhere. You get the impression that the assumption is the claimant is swinging the lead. I don’t particularly like picking on individual advisers, but it is clear to me that this sort of incident needs airing. Iain Duncan Smith likes to give the impression that sick or disabled people who attend DWP interviews always find a welcoming environment and concerned advisers with the time, patience and inclination to meet people’s support needs. I think we’re all supposed imagine that this system works brilliantly and future is rosy as more people are made to attend these sorts of interviews. I sit through these things and I think – yeah. Right. If only.

9 thoughts on “Sick with diabetes? Want to see your GP? Too bad. Get on the work programme. More jobcentre recordings

  1. When I was on the Work Programme, I was told that my hospital appointments were inconvenient and I should try to rearrange them for weekends, I explained to my ‘Work Coach’ that I didn’t make the appointments, it’s the consultants that decide when to see me, I suffer with Diabetes and only have one kidney. It’s as if the staff of the Job Centres just dismiss Diabetes as a simple condition, I’ve even been moaned at in the JC for having a drink so that I could take my pills as my local JC has a no food and drink policy. I told the guy on the ‘Welcome Desk’ that I wouldn’t not have my medication just to appease their stupid rules.

    • Yes I do hear that people come up against the “you can’t have food and drink in here” thing. This guy takes biscuits with him sometimes.

  2. Please see http://mydisabilitystudiesblackboard.blogspot.ca/2015/03/benefit-sanctions-are-jeopardizing.html; I will bring your blog post to the attention of the UN’s Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).

    Since January 2012, I have been reporting voluntarily to the UN’s human rights office, in Geneva, on the welfare crisis for Britain’s sick and disabled. [Fellow Canadian Leilani Farha (@leilanifarha) is the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing; see http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/LeilaniFarha.aspx. You can tweet her on UK housing issues or e-mail her at the UN’s human rights office: srhousing@ohchr.org; she does follow my Twitter account.]

    I’ve been leading a campaign to have the UN open an investigation into Britain’s benefit sanctions regime.

    My Disability Studies Blackboard: The Jobcentre Sanctions Scandal In Britain: With Limited Access To Food Banks, Destitution Is A High Risk For Hundreds of Thousands http://mydisabilitystudiesblackboard.blogspot.ca/2013/03/the-jobcentre-sanctions-scandal-in.html was one of my earlier posts on this matter to senior UN officials. About a year ago, I wrote the following letter to then High Commissioner Navi Pillay; it can be viewed here: http://twishort.com/AAigc. I’m presently compiling an ongoing bibliography of news articles and NGO reports pertaining to benefit sanctions in the United Kingdom and will submit it to the UN’s human rights office. The UN is awaiting the DWP’s response to the Work and Pensions Committee’s report on benefit sanctions policy.

    Britain’s benefit sanctions regime is one of the harshest of all OECD countries—and possibly its most corrupt—if the allegations of widespread “stitching up” of claimants are proven true. Jobcentres have become sanction factories, and are under enormous pressure to financially penalize jobseekers because the DWP’s primary mission is to save staggering sums of £s in benefits provision.

    In my opinion, Jobcentre staff are knowingly engaging in conduct that involves dishonesty, fraud, and deceit. Senior Jobcentre managers should be called to testify before the Work and Pensions Committee to explain why they are pressuring staff to sanction benefit claimants.

    I have very strong views on Britain’s benefit sanctions regime: http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welfareweekly.com%2Fletters-failure-work-pensions-select-committee%2F&ei=DjkDVaTKOIHkgwS1_4PoCA&usg=AFQjCNEmUWUj9Fv0VQ869PhFzLB3I435NA&sig2=oV6YtDT3Q8AOiuUlFAgjUg&bvm=bv.88198703,d.eXY I believe that benefit claimant ‘stitching-up’ needs to recognized as a criminally indictable offense. See also: http://mydisabilitystudiesblackboard.blogspot.ca/2015/03/benefit-sanctions-are-jeopardizing.html

    Former employment minister Esther McVey blamed front-line Jobcentre staff for unfair benefit sanctioning practices instead of taking responsibility for the culture that she had created. The current DWP ministers have the authority to crack down on this type of malfeasance, but have chosen not to do so because it’s being committed at their behest.

    McVey was adamant that there are no sanctions targets, which I firmly believe is a lie, given the preponderance of evidence from whistle-blowers.

    My letter to the Guardian’s Patrick Butler was written prior to the Work and Pensions Committee announcing a second evidence session into benefit sanctions. An independent public inquiry is needed because the DWP cannot be trusted to impartially investigate itself; moreover, the Work and Pensions Committee is prohibited from investigating individual cases.

    I urge you to read https://thepoorsideoflife.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/disabled-sanctioned-for-3-months-over-christmas-and-forced-to-attend-the-jobcentre-daily/ and other harrowing blog pieces from that site.

    (Montreal, Canada)

    • Thanks. The really interesting thing about this as well was that this adviser was a disability employment adviser. Purportedly. These people are meant to have some expertise.

  3. If there was truly a no food or drink policy in the JC+ then it should be displayed at the door, therefore if it is not displayed tell them to Foxtrot Oscar

  4. I am sorry but the JCP lady is not there to worry about his health !! I am 100 % sorry for the guy and he should be on some sickness benefit or other i totally accept that . As far as i am concerned the JCP lady has been put right on the spot and it is only her personal feelings in this matter that made her comment on his obvious disabilty in the first place. When i go and see my work coach the majority are pleasant people doing a difficult job , i for one would not and could not do it. But they are there to discuss what i have tried to do to find work and if there is any help they can give me to do so, as much as this is a total waste of time.

    • she was a disability advisor, her job is to help people with disabilities.Obviously she cares not for people who are ill. They are not there to help people to get work there isn’t any, they are there to penalise and sanction as many people they can, so that Iain Duncan Smith and his cronies, can enjoy being rich, claiming £43 for a breakfast.

  5. Pingback: More jobcentre recordings: We can’t help disabled claimants at this jobcentre. You’ll have to go elsewhere | Kate Belgrave

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.