Sign the petition to oppose further cuts to vital support for disabled people

Sign the petition and clog up Iain Duncan Smith’s email inbox! Okay, so he knows that he is destroying disabled people’s lives, but dropping a reminder of that into his inbox every second is still worthwhile. Heap it on his poisonous arse.

From Disabled People Against Cuts:

“As disabled people, we’ve spent the last five years enduring attack after attack – we’ve fought back in any way we can. But fear and anxiety are now part of everyday life. Over the past five years, we’ve seen our support and whatever security and peace of mind we once had being slowly and methodically being stripped from us. Through a combination of ‘reform’ and the notion of austerity we have been hit by cuts and have borne the brunt of the Coalition’s ideological determination to reduce the welfare state.

“It’s time all political parties came clean on further cuts to disabled peoples support,instead of false promises and lies.

Please, oppose any further cuts to vital support for disabled people and those with chronic health conditions by signing with us.”

Read the full post here.

Update on the house mould pictures – and people who are excluded from political representation

People have been in touch on twitter re: the photos I’ve been posting of mould in a Northwest London flat where a man with learning difficulties has been living:

Mould in doorway entrance

Mould in doorway entrance

Thought I’d put up a short post with more detail as people wanted to know if the problem had been reported, etc, and what could be done. I also thought this was a good opportunity to make a few pertinent points about the people who have taken the real kicking in austerity – and the abject failure of mainstream politics to acknowledge those people or that kicking as we head into the election.

On notifying the council – I reported the mould and this flat to Brent Council a couple of weeks ago on 27 March after visiting the flat. I was shocked by the state of the place then – you can read about that here. The council rang back a few days later with an inspection appointment date for yesterday. As reported here,  the man in that flat is also being evicted from it, just to add to his problems. The Kilburn Unemployed Workers’ Group (who have made an amazing effort to try and sort things out for this bloke) helped him make a homelessness application a few weeks ago and have been ringing landlords and agents all over the place to find someone who will accept a housing benefit tenant. A member of the group was even ringing agents yesterday when we were at the flat waiting for the council officer to arrive for the flat inspection (I took the pictures you see in this post yesterday). Hopefully, this part of the situation will be resolved soon and this man will have a new place to live.

A few extra points, though.

I want people to understand what a collection of disasters people in these situations must deal with. These sorts of things must be happening to people in similar situations all over the place. When the council bloke inspected the flat yesterday, he said that the worst mould – the thick mould on the entrance ceiling in the photo above – could be the result of a water leak problem of some kind upstairs and that the council would instruct the landlord to investigate. The mould round the doors, however, was more likely to do with ventilation problems – the (one) door not being left open often enough, moisture being trapped in the flat and so on. But this is the thing. There are so many problems that have led to this situation and they all have to do with not having enough money. That’s probably an incredibly patronising thing to say, but I’m saying it all the same. Continue reading

Mary says “I left the Tories and joined the Greens because of the Independent Living Fund”

People who follow me on twitter will know that on Thursday, I joined Independent Living Fund recipient Mary Laver and her personal assistants, Mirror journalist Ros Wynne-Jones and Green party members and supporters as Mary travelled all the way from Westminster to Chingford in her wheelchair to protest at the government’s plan to close the ILF. The ILF is used by profoundly disabled people to pay for the extra carer hours that they need to lead independent lives.

That walk to Chingford was a good effort – took us nearly nine hours. Ouch. Respect to all concerned.

In the short film below which I made about the march, Mary says that she left the Conservative party and joined the Green party, because of the present government’s decision to close the ILF (at 5.20 in the video). Labour won’t keep the fund open – although Andy Burnham agrees that ILF recipients need some sort of protection when the fund closes, he wasn’t able to say what those protections would be when I last filmed him. Labour’s hopes for social care seem to be entirely tied up in Burnham’s plans for integrated health and social care services – a plan which is obviously a very long way from being implemented.

Without the ILF, a lot of disabled people will be in a very bad place. They’ll rely on councils to provide those extra care hours – councils that can’t meet demand for care as it is. Funding will be devolved to councils, but only for a limited time, and there are no plans to ringfence the devolved money at many councils.

A few photos from the march to Chingford:

Preparing to leave Westminster at 7.30am

Preparing to leave Westminster at 7.30am

Meeting with fellow ILF recipient Sophie Partridge at Kings Cross station

Meeting with fellow ILF recipient Sophie Partridge at Kings Cross station

 

With supporters at Chingford

With supporters at Chingford

All images and video ©katebelgrave.com.

Week of action against workfare and sanctions 25 April – 2 May

Any MP or prospective MP who thinks that workfare and working for nothing is so bloody great should try it. For years at a time. They can report back after that.

The rest of us will continue to fight workfare, because we know it is rubbish. It’s about forcing people to work for meagre benefits in jobs that should be properly paid. All sorts of jobs are now being done by people who are on workfare and who must do those jobs to get their benefits. I wouldn’t feel too comfortable about this even if you’re in employment. Your job could be a workfare “role” soon. Look at the range of jobs that people on workfare are involved in at this charity.

From Boycott Workfare:

“No workfare. No sanctions. Whoever wins we will resist!

Boycott Workfare is holding a week of action in the week before the election.

“We need your help to expose and challenge workfare and sanctions policies and the political lies that underpin them.”

Read the rest of the post here and find out more about taking part in the week of action to fight workfare and sanctions.

So…which political party will stop this state harassment of people who can’t work?

April 5: Update on the election leaflets (well, there’s been one so far) that I’ve received – I got a Labour campaign leaflet from Lewisham Deptford’s Vicky Foxcroft that doesn’t mention this government’s astounding attacks on sick and disabled people as far as I can see. There’s no mention of Atos, Maximus and the work capability assessment, the months-long queues for Personal Independence Payment asessments, or the elimination of the Independent Living Fund. I can’t even see a reference to the bedroom tax. It’s almost as though people who need some sort of income support because of sickness or disability don’t exist or something. No mention of JSA sanctions, either. How about that. “The next election is a straight choice between a recovery that puts working people and the NHS first with Labour, or continuing with a government that is not listening to hardworking people,” Vicky tells us. Great. We can assume that people who can’t work aren’t entitled to representation from this party – ie, that nobody will be listening to them.

The really amazing thing about all of this is the extent to which the people who have taken the worst of the coalition government’s violent social security “reforms” are airbrushed from these mainstream political manifestos. People have died as a result of this government’s smashing of welfare benefits and unfathomable, utterly illogical eligibility testing. Iain Duncan Smith should be doing jail time because of that and Labour should be pushing for a prosecution. Instead, we get more of this utterly meaningless “hardworking” guff. Is anyone even buying the “hardworking” line anymore? What Vicky is really saying here is “work hard now. You’ll get fuck all if the day comes when you can’t.”

I love elections.

———————————————————————

Original post:

Wonder which mainstream political parties plan to stand up for sick and disabled people who the DWP routinely harasses in the way described on this page (answers on a very very small postit thanks):

Here is ANOTHER letter from the DWP calling a person who is in the Employment and Allowance Support Group to a jobcentre interview:

dwp-02

This is the fourth letter that this person has received in three months calling him to one assessment or another to keep his ESA. I personally think that this non-stop correspondence from the DWP and its fitness-for-work assessors is harassment – particularly in the case of this man, who simply can’t deal with a barrage of official letters and contact. He is in the ESA Support Group because he has serious mental health problems. He finds pressure from the DWP very difficult to deal with and certainly sees these endless official letters as potential threats to his meagre income. People who are in the ESA Support Group are judged to have the most severe health problems. They are meant to be excused from all work and work-related activities. Unfortunately, they’re not excused from non-stop badgering by the DWP and its various private-company fit-for-work assessors. Plenty of people are getting these letters – Disabled People Against Cuts has even set up response-letter templates so that people who are harassed by the DWP in this way can write and tell the DWP to back off. There are days when I think that the DWP and the likes of Atos and Maximus are working in a pincer movement, closing in on people in the Support Group from all sides.

Take the guy who received the letters you see on this page. He got one letter telling him to attend at Atos assessment in about January (that appointment was ultimately postponed, presumably while the work capability assessment baton was passed to Maximus). Then in February, he got a letter which called him to a work-focused interview at the jobcentre. (even though people in the Support Group are excused from all work-related interviews and activities). In the last week of March, he received the letter posted at the top of this page which told him to attend a 40-minute jobcentre meeting with a work coach to assess the amount of ESA he receives. Then last week, he got a letter from Maximus – a letter which calls him to a rescheduled work capability assessment at the end of April. On and on it goes.

Each letter has caused this guy an awful lot of panic and required phone calls and further contact with the letter-sender – to confirm appointment times, to ask if assessments could be recorded, or changed, or to cancel appointments where they were not actually compulsory. People in the Support Group, as I say, don’t actually have to attend work-focused interviews. They’re just harassed and hounded into thinking they should. This guy’s wife says that she was told off when she rang the DWP to say that he would never attend a work-focused interview at the jobcentre (his mental health problems are so bad that he can hardly leave the house). She said the DWP told her not to say Never, because the jobcentre might get vindictive. Brilliant. Continue reading

Support the Sweets Way occupiers as they resist eviction in court today

Update from Sweets Way campaigners:


BUT – It ain’t over yet. A new social centre has been set up just outside the injunction zone.
Rock on.

Well done those campaigners.

———————————————————–

Original post:

From Sweets Way Resists:

We’re in court this morning fighting Annington Homes for our right to housing! They are not only demanding we leave our homes, but also trying to obtain an injunction to prevent us protesting on the estate.”

Come and show your support this morning (Monday 30 March):

9.30am
Barnet County Court, St Mary’s Court,
Regents Park Road, London N3 1BQ

Then afterwards with the residents…

https://www.facebook.com/events/433124830197068/

You can read more here about ways to support the protest.

The real scroungers: landlords hoovering housing benefit for disgusting places like this

Update 27 March: the state of this flat has been reported to Brent council. They said they will arrange an inspection.

————————

Look at the mould here:

Bottom_wall_mould

This is a picture from the tiny “studio” flat currently occupied by Eddie (name changed), the 51-year-old man with learning difficulties I’ve been attending jobcentre meetings with. He’s being evicted from this place – a couple of us went with him to Brent council on Monday to start his homelessness application. Eviction or not, he needs to get out of this room fast. I understand that the council is organising properties for him to look at. He may end up out of the borough.

God only knows how many other people are living in places like this. Here’s the mould on the ceiling in the little entrance-bay in the flat:

ceiling_mould

This studio flat is purely revolting. It’s very small – there’s a bed and a small, filthy kitchen all shoved into one room, with a shower and toilet sort of clipped on at the back. There are mice. There are cockroaches. The mould you can see in the pictures. I took the pictures today when I went to meet Eddie to walk to his jobcentre signon appointment.

But here’s the thing. Eddie’s landlord is collecting £1000 a month in housing benefit for this place. I’ve seen Eddie’s housing benefit settlement papers for this year – £250 a week, which his papers confirm is paid to the landlord. Remember this next time you hear George Osborne yapping on about scroungers. It ain’t guys like Eddie who are taking the piss with their miserable weekly jobseekers’ allowances of about £71. The people who are having a very big laugh on the taxpayer are the landlords who hoover up thousands of pounds in housing benefit for crapholes like you see here. This is the kind of mould that causes serious health problems, surely. The air was rotten. I couldn’t wait to get out of the place. But there we are. This is the kind of environment that is considered perfectly acceptable for people with learning difficulties in our day and age.

Brent council has been in contact on twitter about the photos of the mould that I tweeted, so I’ll be sending a complaint and the photos through. This landlord needs to be taken out of circulation. He’s evicting Eddie and God knows what his plans are next for this flat. I suppose he could decide to put a family with very small children in this place to live with this mould. He could pick someone else on housing benefit who has no choice except to live like this. Who knows.

Side_wall

top_window

Video of the flat taken in June last year:

 

When exactly did it start being okay to treat people with learning difficulties like trash?

I wonder.

Here’s a story about one person who is caught in a sort of three-way systems meltdown. God only knows how many times this sort of situation is being replicated across the country:

Yesterday, I visited Brent Council with Eddie* (name changed), an unemployed 51-year-old Kilburn man who has learning and literacy difficulties. I’ve been accompanying Eddie to his various council and jobcentre meetings for months now. The whole thing has been a right eye-opener, for me at least. It has certainly opened my eyes to the various systemic meltdowns that austerity has left us with, and the people who are on the rough end of the whole shambles.

This guy definitely is at that rough end. Last time I wrote about Eddie, I explained how he’d been shouted at by a jobcentre adviser at his latest appointment. The adviser had signed him up for a work choice course without telling him what it was about, or how to organise his travel to it (it’s on the Caledonian Road somewhere) and then took exception when he started to complain. We’d both sat there as the adviser listed his sins (loudly) as the jobcentre saw them. No concession was made to his learning or literacy difficulties during that unpleasant exchange. The only reason that I’d cut that adviser any slack at all was that she’d been reasonable in the past and looked purely exhausted on the day of the yelling-match. Maybe she’d just been bawled out by some sanctions-happy manager who didn’t think she was hitting targets. I generally wonder where the PCS is at these moments. It’s pretty clear to me that some jobcentre workers are too stressed-out to cope a lot of the time (this adviser told me several months ago that back in the day, she saw about five JSA claimants a day. These days, she sees about 15). There certainly are some sadists working at jobcentres, but there are also people who try to be reasonable. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to be reasonable when you’re working in an utterly unreasonable, punitive, sanctions-driven workplace. Anyway – more on that particular situation soon. We’re picking it up with the jobcentre later this week.

Yesterday, we were at the Brent council offices. We were there because Eddie has another problem – he’s about to be evicted from the crummy studio flat that he’s been living in for a couple of years. He had a meeting with the council to try and get registered as homeless. Eddie isn’t too worried about leaving the studio flat as such and you wouldn’t blame him for that if you saw the place. “Studio” is too romantic a word for it. “Hovel” would be closer to the mark. You can see that in the video here (I took this in about June last year, so the place has deteriorated even further since then):


Continue reading