Focus E15 mothers public meeting and marches June-July 2014

Tuesday 10 June 2014 – hear the Focus E15 mothers talk about their fight for social housing and see films from their campaign.

They’ll also be at The Spark in June and marching on Saturday 5 July for decent housing for all.

Decent housing is something you get if you’re rich, but must fight for if you’re not. As readers of this site will know, the young mothers of Newham’s Focus E15 temporary accommodation hostel have been battling Newham Council and the East Thames Housing Association for housing in Newham borough (links to stories on this battle below). Some of the woman have been placed in flats in the private sector – but only for a year and that year is almost half-gone for some.

The FE15 mums will speak about the FocusE15 campaign and show short films from this year’s housing office occupations and confrontations with Newham mayor Robin Wales. They’ll talk about the pressure they managed to apply to Wales and how they managed to stop the council from sending them out of London to live.

Here are a few of the films I took this year to be going on with:

Robin Wales racing out of a council meeting and away from the young mums (Wales has certainly got a turn of speed when he needs it. Look at him go):

The women occupying the council’s housing offices to demand decent social housing for all:

List of articles on Focus E15:

Open Democracy article: Why is middle class feminism so disinterested in women hit by austerity? (interviews with the Focus E15 mothers on their campaign to date)

Newham council runs out of meeting to avoid Focus E15 mothers’ protest

Focus E15 mothers take their petition for social housing to Boris at City Hall

Focus E15 mothers’ battle for social housing: an update

Young mothers occupy Newham council housing offices to demand social housing

Rubbish, mice and mould – good enough for young mums without money

Put this on a banknote: young mothers without money abandoned by the political class

The DWP must explain how it will adjust Atos WCAs for mental health claimants

From Disabled People Against Cuts:

MHRN outside Royal Courts of Justice

MHRN and campaigners outside Royal Courts of Justice

The Mental Health Resistance Network, supported by Disabled People Against Cuts, wil hold a vigil at the front entrance of the Royal Courts of Justice on Tuesday 8 July 2014 at 12 noon to 2pm to highlight important issues around the Work Capability Assessment Judicial Review for Mental Health Claimants.

Two years ago, two people who claim benefits on mental health grounds initiated a judicial review of the Atos Work Capability Assessment. The two people were supported by the Mental Health Resistance Network. In May 2013, the judges presiding over the case ruled that the WCA places mental health claimants at a “substantial disadvantage” and that the DWP should make “reasonable adjustments” to alleviate this.

Often mental health claimants struggle to provide further medical evidence to support their claim for Employment Support Allowance (ESA) and may not be able to accurately self report how their mental health conditions affect them – either when completing forms or at face to face assessments. Many claimants are wrongly found fit for work and subjected to the stress of appealing the decision. Continue reading

Independent Living Fund protestors get in the DWP’s face

Here are videos from the DWP on Monday, when Disabled People Against Cuts blocked all building doors to protest at Mike Penning’s disastrous plan to close the Independent Living Fund.

The Independent Living Fund is used by people with severe disabilities to pay for the extra carer hours they need to live independent lives and stay out of carehomes. Because they have personal assistants available most of the time, ILF recipients have the support they need to work, study, socialise and generally get on with life like everyone else. Without that money, people will be forced to rely on the council social care system – a system that has been, as we all know, utterly decimated by government cuts and can’t meet demand as it is. There is absolutely no way that devastated council social care departments will be able to pay for the round-the-clock, high-cost care packages that many ILF recipients need – certainly not in an ongoing way.

ILF funding is actually used by many people to top up existing council care packages – that is certainly the case for most of the ILF recipients I’ve interviewed. That’s because these care packages are expensive. Penning can whack on all he likes about keeping a safety net in place for disabled people, but he knows and I know and everyone knows what the future holds for ILF recipients if the fund is closed. People with severe impairments will be shoved into carehomes (that’s assuming spaces are available, which I would not assume), or stuck at home in incontinence pads and relying on fractured council care. If they’re lucky. I’m already speaking to disabled people who must spend a great deal of their time fighting their local councils for care (this woman is one of those people – more on her story soon). I’ve already spoken with people who must spend their weekends in bed because their council-funded care packages don’t stretch to cover Saturdays and Sundays. Continue reading

The realities of a daily trip to the jobcentre in a wheelchair…

Second story with Angela is here: Disabled and without a carer overnight? Go to Asda!

—————-

Right. A bit more on the realities of George Osborne’s ironically-named “Help to Work” scheme and this government’s useless Back To Work concepts generally:

The woman in these videos is Angela Smith, who lives in Wembley. Angela worked for about 20 years and was laid off from her most recent job (working with young disabled people) in 2011. She signed on then. She has a university degree.

Angela also has cerebral palsy. She uses public transport to get around and to attend her fortnightly signing-on days at the Wembley jobcentre and to see her work programme provider at Reed Partnership in Harrow. At the moment, those are her two obligations. She describes both of these days as a complete waste of time. Having attended one of these days with her last week, I see her point. We travelled all the way from her house to the Wembley jobcentre on the bus (an almighty drama, as you’ll see in the video below) for a 15-minute wait and five-minute handing over of jobsearch papers. That was it. Angela took a folder of paper for a bus ride to the jobcentre, dropped it off, and left. There was no discussion of jobsearch while we were there, no offers to help find work, or to fill in application forms – nothing. I said it before and I’ll say it again – this jobcentre process is beyond Kafkaesque. People are made to turn up to jobcentres to show evidence of searches for jobs that don’t exist, or for which they are unsuited, or unlikely to hear anything of again, and then they leave the jobcentre – often to do the jobhunting that they had to put off for a couple of hours to attend their pointless signing-on session at the jobcentre. It really is a pointless exercise to beat all.

With Help To Work, people who have been long-term unemployed must take part in that pointless activity every day. They either must travel in to sign on at their jobcentre, or participate in workfare schemes. Angela has been out of work for two and a half years, so has some concerns about the scheme and how she’ll get on if it applies to her if she’s still unemployed after three years. With that in mind, she wanted to show what her trip to the jobcentre already looks like. She finds it a challenge and you’ll see why in the videos below. I accompanied her to the jobcentre last week on London’s so-called accessible public transport.

It went like this:

Bus trip to Wembley jobcentre

It was raining, which meant the bus was crowded. There were two buggies in the wheelchair space and nobody offered to fold theirs, so Angela had to sit in the doorway in her wheelchair – hardly ideal, as you’ll see. Then, things escalated – par for the course in a crowded bus with space taken up by buggies. One of the people with a buggy had to get off the bus before we got to our stop. Angela pushed the button to call for the ramp so that she could get off the bus, make room for one of the people with the buggies to get off and then get back on. Unfortunately, the driver didn’t realise all this was going on and he shut the doors on Angela’s foot as she tried to get back on. When she did get back on, he came over to remonstrate.

He asked Angela what she’d been doing – and then he did something that people often do when dealing with disabled people. He asked Angela who she was with (the assumption always is that disabled people can’t be out and about by themselves) and when he worked out that Angela and I were together in some capacity, he started to address his questions to me. He asked me if Angela was all right. I told him that it was probably better to put that question to Angela, seeing as it was her foot that got stuck in the door. He said to me – “but is she all right?” I told him again that Angela was probably best placed to answer that question. He asked me again. I told him to speak to Angela. This went on for some time. He was obviously worried that there’d be trouble because of the foot incident and he needed confirmation that there wouldn’t be trouble. He seemed to want that confirmation from someone who wasn’t in a wheelchair. Bit of equalities training needed there, I think. Boris Johnson, our very own self-styled Mr Accessibility, might want to get onto that.

After all of that, we finally got to the right stop and headed for the jobcentre. The meeting we had there was pointless, as I say. We waited for about 15 minutes for someone to see Angela. The man who saw her was pleasant enough, but he didn’t say too much about helping Angela with her search for work. He just took up her papers, had a quick look and then told me that Angela would need to fill in the space for her email address. I’m not sure why he told me. I told him to talk to Angela about her papers. Angela explained that she isn’t able to physically write (she uses her computer) and so couldn’t fill in the box for the email address by hand. She said she could read her email address out for him. He said it would probably be best to do that with another adviser at another time. And that was that. Then, Angela went home start work on a job application she’s writing. Interesting that she had to get her trip to the jobcentre out of the way before she could get down to applying for a job.

As Angela says in the video: “Imagine doing that every day.”

Indeed.

When will the #PCS leadership act to stop #sanctions?

I try to be patient about these things, but have run out on this one.

Am sure people have seen this (last week’s standout No Shit Sherlock headline):

Sanctions ineffective, jobcentre staff say.”

A PCS survey showed that “jobcentre staff do not believe stopping people’s benefits encourages them to look for work.”

Right. We know that sanctions are punitive and pointless, but it is useful to have confirmation of this from the people who implement them:

“Echoing the government’s own research, in a survey of our members who work as jobcentre advisors, 70% of respondents said sanctions had no positive impact.”

And

“In the survey, 23% said they had been given an explicit target for making sanction referrals and 81% said there was an ‘expectation’ level.

Almost two thirds said they had experienced pressure to refer claimants for a sanction inappropriately.

More than one third stated they had been placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP) for not making “enough” referrals and 10% had gone as far as formal performance procedures.

The performance system can lead to dismissal so this kind of pressure is a thinly veiled threat to people’s jobs.”

There we are.

My question: What next, Mark?

The PCS needs to pull finger, fast. I say that as a friend. I think.

You don’t have to be a great analyst to understand that the government’s unachievable Help To Work scheme will increase the pressure on jobcentre staff in a terminal way. We’re seeing pretty bad scenes as it is. As readers of this site will know, I’ve spent a lot of time at jobcentres lately, talking to JSA claimants about their experiences in those centres. They already report a poisonous atmosphere as staff and claimants fight each other over sanctions and jobsearch requirements. I’ve certainly heard about confrontations to which the police have been called.

The PCS seems to get this:

“The stricter regime has led to an increase in violence and threats, with 72% of respondents reporting an increase in verbal abuse and 37% seeing an increase in physical abuse.”

Can’t see those numbers changing in a way that will help staff, I have to say. What I can see is the entire jobcentre “function” being handed over to G4S, or A4e, or whoever. That will be a nightmare. Privatisation inevitably is and those companies are, as we all know, as dodgy as they are voracious. The great irony is that a privatised setup will probably prove easier to fight. That is – amazingly – the point that we’re at. Activists can target a private company and turn the brand toxic – witness the impressive campaign against Atos. By comparison, fighting this era’s government departments without serious public sector union action (ie lengthy strikes and an ongoing refusal to follow government orders) is yielding very thin results.

Hope the PCS announces strike plans soon. There’ll be nothing left if it doesn’t. This government is not big on negotiation. Union leaders are taking a seriously long time to get that. I mean – it’s been four years. I do wonder how long do these people plan to wait. I also wonder what they are waiting for, exactly. More death?

#JSA claimants: #HelpToWork won’t help us

Longer article at Open Democracy with interviews from people on jobseekers’ allowance around the country. They talk about sanctions, the utter uselessness of the work programme and the reasons why jobcentres are in no position to make Osborne’s ridiculous Help To Work Scheme happen:

“After barely five minutes the jobcentre doors open and a young man bursts out, raging. He is as furious as hell. He is screaming ‘Wankers’ and ‘Fucking Cunts’, and spitting as he shouts. We all stand still and watch him – the unemployed workers’ group members, me, people walking to and from the jobcentre and people standing at the bus-stop across the road on Cambridge Avenue. We’re all half-waiting for a punch-up and for a moment, it seems that we’ll get it.

“I’ve just been sanctioned for 13 fucking weeks!” the young man screams as he stamps down the jobcentre ramp. “Thirteen weeks! I’m going to come back here with a fucking hammer!” I wonder if he will. Thirteen weeks is a very long time to go without any income. I know that I couldn’t afford three months without money coming in and I’m not on JSA. Clarence, who has a relaxed manner and an ability to put people at ease, steps forward to say something. The unemployed workers’ group helps local people with problems like sanctions. Maybe this guy could come along to the weekly meeting? I step forward and ask the young man if he wants to talk about the sanction. He absolutely does not. A jobcentre adviser has just told him that he’ll get no money for three months. “Why the fuck would I want to talk about it?” he shrieks as he disappears towards the high street. “I’m coming back here with a fucking hammer!””

People leave jobcentres with problems, not solutions. I don’t think I’ve seen a shambles to beat it, and I’ve been around. Person after person reels out of these jobcentres, often with folders full of official paper – unsigned letters demanding attendance at we’re-not-telling-you-what-this-is-about meetings, sheets instructing people to attend work programme classes in one part of London and to drop jobsearch sheets off in another (it’s basically ‘taking pieces of paper for an outing’, JSA claimant Angela Smith told me just this week), numbers to call to chase sanctioned benefits, or to switch to ESA, numbers to call that are literally never answered, forms to fill in for emergency loans with no suggestion that they’ll be granted, pointless instructions to apply for as many as 20 jobs a week, often using the notoriously useless Universal Jobmatch, and so on. I have yet to meet a single person who has found a job through their jobcentre. Everyone I meet who finds work finds it themselves, through ads and contacts. Adding Help To Work’s daily signings-on and workfare obligations to this mess will be a stretch. I can’t imagine that jobcentres will be able to keep on top of it.

Read the rest here.

Help To Work? HAHAHAHAHA. More stories from the jobcentre

I went back to the jobcentre last week with the Kilburn Unemployed Workers’ Group – just a few days before George Osborne’s already-discredited Help To Work scheme is rolled out. Thought I’d ask JSA claimants what they thought of the scheme. Only one person I spoke to had heard of it and she said she’d refuse to participate in it.

Help To Work looks like a shambles to beat all the others, including the work programme. A lot of people doubt that Help To Work will even get off the ground. You can read more about the government’s failure to find “partners” for the scheme’s workfare component here. With Help To Work, people who’ve been unemployed for the long term will apparently “take part in community work placements, such as clearing up litter and graffiti,” (that’s workfare), attend “daily signings at the jobcentre,” or find themselves in receipt of “intensive support to address their problems,” whatever that means. The DWP’s recent pilot study on Help To Work yielded extremely thin results, even by the DWP’s standards. “Here’s what happened,” the Guardian said last week. “Exactly the same number in the control group – 18% – found themselves jobs as those doing the forced community work. Just 1% more found jobs from the group with jobcentre support. In other words, workfare didn’t work.”

Brilliant.

I’ve got a longer article coming out on all this later this week (it covers the utter failure of workfare schemes around the world), so more on that soon. For now – I’ve posted below two transcripts from long interviews with JSA claimants I did at the Kilburn jobcentre last week. I’ve been collecting these interviews with JSA claimants for the past three months (there are links to the others at the end of this post). I’m posting these latest ones to show again how utterly dysfunctional the jobcentre system is for people who use it. These places are a nightmare. They are certainly a nightmare as far as administration goes. I can’t imagine how they’ll cope with Help To Work’s mass daily signings-on and workfare-attendance coordination. JSA claimants already show me all sorts of pointless paperwork they receive but don’t quite get: jobcentre letters demanding attendance at we’re-not-telling-you-what-this-is-about meetings, sheets instructing people to attend work programme classes that they can’t afford the fares to, lists of numbers to call to chase sanctioned benefits, numbers to call that are never answered (I’ve stood with people for ages while they’ve rung).

Continue reading

Join the campaign to save the Independent Living Fund #ILF

From DPAC:

Please help save the independent living fund! The government plans to close the fund at the end of June 2015.

“I got up this morning, brushed my teeth, showered, ate breakfast, got dressed, checked my e mails, went to work, had lunch with colleagues, met with friends on the way home from work, popped in on my mum to see she was alright before coming home to do a couple of hours work on my open university degree before bed. I was able to do all this because of the money from the Independent Living Fund that helps pay my Personal Assistant to support me to do the things I can’t manage to do directly because I have a condition that means my hands do not work and I get around using a wheelchair” – ILF recipient.

The money from the independent living fund helps pay for a personal assistant, and enables disabled people who need support to have a quality of life to do the same things everyone else can do. Live.

Video: a day with ILF recipient Mary Laver as she explains how important round-the-clock care is for her:

The government says “ILF recipients will be reassessed by their local authority, and will be funded by the local authority” The money given to the local authority to meet a disabled person’s support needs will not be ring fenced. The local authority can spend that money meant for disabled people and their support needs on other resources. Disabled people who need the support fear less or no support at all and then being placed into residential care, far from friends and family. Continue reading

Jobseekers required to do more to get Esther McVey cheap votes

Another week and another pile of crap from Esther McVey on JSA claimant conditions. This week – hopeless guff about newly-unemployed people having to prepare CVs (most of the many newly-unemployed people I’ve talked to at jobcentres have one, because they’re stuck in the low-pay, insecure work cycle and are always looking for jobs), set up an email address and register on the notoriously useless Universal Jobmatch website – the one that people at jobcentres describe to me as “a waste of time. Most of the jobs in there – they don’t bother to check the computer to see if the jobs in there are already filled. Every two weeks I go there, the same old jobs are in there. It’s just rubbish.”

Doesn’t stop McVey, though. Rubbish is her thing. “This is about treating people like adults and setting out clearly what is expected of them so they can hit the ground running,” she blathers. Bollocks. It’s about nothing of the kind. It’s about introducing a few more steps for already-under-resourced, dysfunctional jobcentres to fail to administer properly, which will make it more difficult for people to get their first, much-needed benefit payment and could lead to sanctions as McVey’s own press release happily notes. All these things will do is keep people off the benefit books. People won’t show up in benefit stats. That’s what this garbage is about. People already have to leap through hoops to get their crappy £71 a week and they are already perfectly aware that there are expectations, thanks. They already have to participate in absurd form-filling exercises which take god knows how long and never lead to work. I’ve spoken with people who have to show that they’ve searched for 25 jobs a week – with at least some of these jobs being roles that are advertised on Universal Jobmatch, which of course leads nowhere. I’ve spoken to people who’ve gone on work programme-type courses which have involved ripping sheets of paper up and putting them back together again to learn about teamwork.

Here are some of the people I’ve spoken with in the last two months – about their struggles with JSA and the experiences they’ve had trying to deal with a system that is designed to push people off benefits and nothing else. This system is certainly not about getting people into jobs, let me tell you. It’s about putting the fear of god into everyone about unemployment. In my experience, people have to sort the getting jobs part out themselves. I’ve yet to meet anyone who has found work through their jobcentre. Absolutely everyone I’ve spoken to so far who has found work has done so off their own bat, through their own contacts. I’ve got more of these interviews to upload as well. You’ll get the point from these ones, though – this is a system that already sets people up to fail. McVey simply adds further conditions and further options for failure and sanction.

Continue reading

Maria Miller gets a fancy house while women with no money must beg for homes

Video: a person sleeping rough outside legendary tax-dodgers Starbucks in the Stratford Centre on Friday. Hope Newham Council does not slap an Asbo on this person.

——————-

Ok. Today, I will give you an example of our one-rule-for-the-rich-and-one-rule-for-everyone-else society in action:

Almost to the day that Maria Miller gave her non-apology for ripping taxpayers off for a house and her own financial gain, I stood outside Newham council’s housing offices with a group of young people who were there to plead for accommodation. Some of the young people were Focus E15 mothers, the group of young women who lived or still live at the Focus E15 hostel in the mother-and-baby unit and have been campaigning for social housing in the borough. Others were young people who aren’t parents, but who live in other parts of the Focus E15 hostel and are worried about eviction.

So. It was pretty hard not to think about the rank hypocrisy of the political class as I stood with this group of people outside Newham’s housing offices. There’s so much of this hypocrisy around now that you actually find yourself watching it unfold live. You can stand in a London street reading updates on Maria Miller’s meaningless “apology” on your phone while a group of people who have no money plead with council officers for homes. This is the time and place we’re in. We live in a society that is constructed entirely of double standards. Maria Miller has money – a lot of it ours, it would seem. The young people outside Newham housing offices on Friday, on the other hand, don’t have money. They have no money and no connections. Some of them have “problem” histories. They are dismissed because of those things. They are young, but will be dismissed forever because of those things. This double standard will finish us all if you ask me. Maria Miller gets the warm support of David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith and a wee slap on the wrist for hoovering an incredible amount for her second home (and so what if she is ultimately sacked or demoted. She’ll be back. These people are never sacked). By comparison, the young people campaigning for housing outside Newham council on Friday regularly get called sluts (because some of them have babies), wasters and layabouts and told that they’ve done nothing to deserve a roof.

I’ve heard variations on that theme ever since I started writing about the Focus E15 mothers’ campaign. Worthies at this recent women’s event asked me, for example, if I really thought that the young campaigners deserved social housing. Did I really think that would be the best thing for them? The concern seemed to be that housing these “poor” people securely would awaken the dreaded, so-called sense of entitlement in them. Of course – no mention was or is ever made of the startling (and poisonous) sense of entitlement that people like Maria Miller have. You never hear about that. Ever. You only ever hear about the greedy, grasping, aggressive poor who will take an inch and then a mile and then your wallet. It’s the double standard that gets me. The double standard is unreal.

Continue reading