Government and “opposition” terror of disabled protestors

As you’ll likely know, last week disabled protestors held another demonstration against cuts to disabled people’s funding: the #Balls2TheBudget protest outside Downing Street, on Westminster Bridge and then outside parliament.

I thought the police might get pissy at this protest, because they were so badly shown up when Disabled People Against Cuts successfully occupied the central lobby at parliament in protest at the ILF closure a couple of weeks ago. And the police did get nasty. Things were okay-ish when protestors carried out the ball-throwing exercise at Downing Street and then closed down Westminster Bridge to protest at cuts, but the police mood soured very fast when people blocked the roads outside parliament. That change in tenor was noticeable. The coppers started to shove protestors around and they pulled down the Balls2TheBudget banner that people held across the street. It was almost as though a message had been sent from our glorious leaders to shut the demonstration down outside parliament right at that moment:

In this video, a copper tells disabled protestor Sam Brackenbury that his carer will be arrested if she stays on the road. Charming:

This video shows the amazing moment when Labour’s Sadiq Khan bolted as he happened upon DPAC protestor Andy Greene who was in his wheelchair and surrounded by police. Four people were arrested for highway obstruction during the protest. Greene was one of them. Khan’s failure to respond in any way whatsoever really was remarkable. He couldn’t find a single word to say about the situation. You’ll see in the video that he just stared at everyone, then legged it. That’s the Labour party for you in these fraught times: disabled people block roads in protest at government slaughtering of social care funds and screwing of disability benefits, and Labour MPs can’t bring themselves to look, let alone to stop. Still, everyone got the message. Nothing says You Lot Are On Your Own more eloquently than Khan’s total non-contribution here:

Thanks a bunch for that, Sadiq. Very helpful.

The arrests were eloquent in their very nature: I think we can confidently say that the establishment had decided to up the ante against these protestors after they occupied parliament on 24 June. That won’t stop people. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we’re seeing something important here. This isn’t just noise for the hell of it. Disabled people are taking the fight for social security to government because they have to, and the louder they get, the more vindictive government gets. Meanwhile, Labour flinches from the sidelines… and continues on the fast-track to oblivion. Everything is escalating – everything except the Labour party, I guess, which appears to be leaving the picture altogether. I’m not sure how this one ends.

Justin Tomlinson talking shit on the Independent Living Fund #saveILF

Short update on the recently closed Independent Living Fund:

A couple of weeks ago, Minister for Disabled People Justin Tomlinson wrote an imperious letter to the Guardian in response to an Aditya Chakrabortty article about social security cuts.

Tomlinson’s letter included this very touchy paragraph about the government’s closure of the Independent Living Fund – the fund that severely disabled people used to pay for essential extra carer hours before the government closed the fund on June 30:

“Aditya Chakrabortty’s article (Disabled people have become human collateral in an ideological war, 9 June) is a travesty of the truth. First among a catalogue of inaccuracies is the claim that support made available to some disabled people under the independent living fund is to be removed. Responsibility for providing this support is, in fact, being transferred to local authorities. Far from being taken away, it will be administered in a way better able to take account of variations in local circumstances and services.”

Tomlinson was talking total shit, of course. We knew that and many have reported on it, but still. I sent an FOI recently to local authorities to ask for updates on the devolution of ILF funding to councils.

FOI responses have started to trickle in. It’s still early days, but we can already see where this is going. A few examples: Lewisham council says it still doesn’t have a final figure for the amount of devolved ILF funding it will get from government (Lewisham sent its response today). Sunderland only found out how much it would get a week before the ILF closed and only began to assess ILF recipients to figure out their future care needs and costs on 1 July. Some councils haven’t yet assessed the former ILF recipients that they’re now responsible for and some have only assessed a few. Nobody has any idea if they’ll get any money after 2016 (the government has said only the ILF money will be devolved to councils for a year). And I got an intriguing response today from Barking and Dagenham council in response to a question about the council’s expectations re: its ability to fund care for ILF recipients in an ongoing way.

I asked: “Does the authority expect to be able to meet the care costs of all ILF recipients to the same level as ILF funding?”

“No,” said the council.

Always interesting to get a straight reply from a local authority. It was certainly a straighter answer than Tomlinson gave in his highly misleading, disingenuous, whiny letter.

Anyway. There we are. More as responses come in.

Video: disabled protestors occupy parliament on 24 June in protest at the closure of the Independent Living Fund:

 

54 and out of work: how the DWP hounds you to amuse itself. More stories from the jobcentre

Thought I’d spend a few pre-budget days rolling out more transcripts from interviews with people on the rubbish end of Tory austerity.

This one is yet another story about jobcentres and useless back-to-work activities (the transcript is at the end):

I went to one of the northwest London jobcentres last week to hand out leaflets with the Kilburn unemployed workers’ group … and I spent a long time talking to an older bloke (he was 54) who said he’d been in the jobcentre for an hour writing his CV with an adviser.

We’ll call this guy Keith. Keith was in the Work Related Activity Group for Employment and Support Allowance. He told me that he’d worked for much of his life in engineering as a fitter, but that all came to an end after a bad car accident about a decade ago. “Now I can’t do it. It’s physically impossible, because I’ll be in and around machines and all. That [accident] was the end of my engineering days. That finished me for a while and then I was really down.”

I give you this work history, because Keith reported it. I personally couldn’t care less whether people have worked or not, or what their histories are. As time goes on, I care less and less. If people are 50+, disabled and at a jobcentre, they’re a) usually in need at that moment in time, b) unlikely to get work because they’re on the scrapheap as far as employers are concerned and c) going to be written off as scroungers whether they worked all their lives or not. Those are the only relevant facts these days. Nothing else that people have or haven’t been or done counts.

Anyway, I ramble… Atos had, of course, found Keith fit for work, in a relatively recent assessment. Keith had managed to get that decision overturned on appeal. He was placed in the WRAG group for ESA. WRAG is the ESA group that the DWP wants to get rid of  – their latest move in what is a none-too-subtle campaign to eliminate disability benefits altogether, along with the concept that some people just can’t work. Because he’s in that Work Related Activity Group, Keith must turn out to the jobcentre every few weeks and engage in completely pointless “work-related” activities.

I say “completely pointless” because that is exactly what those activities are. They’re not about getting people into work. They’re about making sure that older, disabled people like Keith are constantly prodded. Nothing else. They’re just prodded. They’re not helped into decent, decently-paid work, or anything as romantic as that. They’re prodded and needled and nudged and got at, and that’s about that. Keith told me that his adviser happily conceded that the CV-writing was not about getting a job, but just an exercise to complete to meet government requirements. “[The adviser] said – “well, you done your CV and you’re covered. As far as the government is concerned, you’ve done your thing. Just do it” Keith said that he must return to the jobcentre in a few weeks’ time to participate in another “activity.” There’ll be more after that. I imagine Keith is being lined up as fodder for this or that privately-provided work course, or similar purposeless bollocks. On and on it goes. Continue reading

Short video: ILF closed and disabled campaigners vow to up the ante

This is a video I made today as Disabled People Against Cuts delivered a petition to save the Independent Living Fund to the tosser installed at 10 Downing Street. Campaigners blocked Whitehall for a time and then there was a procession to parliament:

Video transcript here.

A sad day, but people certainly plan to be back. Off to parliament again next week. Pretty good result there last week:

Balls to the budget on budget day! Balls to it all.

From Disabled People Against Cuts:

DPAC joined by Class War, Streets Kitchen, Black Dissidents & others

Announce:

Balls to the Budget

#Balls2TheBudget

Wednesday 8 July, 10.30 am
Downing St

Big balls, small balls, footballs, tennis balls, volleyballs, handballs, rubber balls, plastic balls, flour balls, paint balls, canon balls, beachballs, hairballs, furballs, glitter balls, gumballs, basketballs, garlic balls, initialed balls, personalised balls.

Get creative.

Balls to austerity
Balls to taking our rights
Balls to taking our jobs
Balls to cutting our services
Balls to bankers bonuses
Balls to cutting the ILF
Balls to Met Police
Balls to cuts to Access to Work
Balls to cuts to Social Care
Balls to the Bedroom Tax
Balls to Workfare & Sanctions
Balls to Forced Treatments
Balls to Maximus, Atos & PIP
Balls to Child Poverty & inequality
Balls to low pay & exploiting workers
Balls to anti-homeless laws
Balls to stifling protest
Balls to migrant bashing, racism & Islamophobia
Balls to cuts to Housing, Education, NHS, Legal Aid, Womens Refuges, CAMHS and much much more.

Then, afterwards – We Are Going Back.

11.30 The Lobby, House of Commons. Bring balls.

Online: Twitter from 10.30 am till yer tweeting fingers wear out
Take part online by using and sharing: #Balls2TheBudget

There is a tweetlist you can use here: http://dftr.org.uk/Songbird.php?TweetFile=Balls2theBudget

See DPAC for updates.

Videos and pics from today: disabled people occupy central lobby at parliament #saveILF

Update 28 June 2015:

Join Disabled People Against Cuts on Tuesday 30 June at 11.30am at Downing Street as they deliver a petition calling for government to protect disabled people’s right to independent living.

From Disabled People Against Cuts:

“ILF recipients, campaigners and Allies will meet outside Downing Street to hand over petitions calling on the Prime Minister to protect disabled people’s right to independent living. Over 25,000 signatures have been collected online (supported by the brilliant video made by the stars of Coronation Street) and also during the Graeae Theatre Company’s 2014 UK Tour of The Threepenny Opera.”

Follow @Dis_PPL_Protest on twitter for updates.

———————————————————————————————————-

Updates from Disabled People Against Cuts:

Why the ILF closure is threatening disabled people’s social care packages and how the DWP has lied about local council capacity for funding care for disabled people with the highest support needs.

Read the letter to MPs that disabled people stormed parliament to deliver on Wednesday.

Original post:

To parliament then today! – where disabled campaigners took the police by surprise in a very big way. Disabled campaigners occupied parliament’s central lobby in protest at government plans to close the Independent Living Fund in just a week’s time. The ILF is a fund that profoundly disabled people rely on to pay for personal assistants and the extra carer hours they need. Needless to say, this government thinks the ILF should be closed and disabled people cast adrift.

More pictures and videos at Disabled People Against Cuts here.

The police panicked when this occupation started and they got heavy. There must have been about 50 coppers? – Perhaps more. They did hurt a couple of people – I heard one copper say very clearly that the police were trained to use pressure points.

They also grabbed my arms and yelled “She’s filming!” when they saw the camera. The arm-grabbing is the reason why some of the video is shaky. I had to take the SD card out and shove it into my sweaty old bra. Still – on we go. The police threatened pretty quickly to confiscate my phone and camera, so I beat it out of there to get the pics out. Not really feeling the love today, as in #lovethepolice. Etc.

Some pics uploaded now below.

Video: disabled people occupy parliament’s central lobby (includes shot at the start of a copper lifting one guy’s wheelchair to swing it around):

Police start to get shirty:

Disabled people start to occupy the hall and police work out what is going on. Then they get heavy (they were grabbing my arms at this point, so the video is shaky towards the end:

Campaigners in the central hall:

At_Central_Lobby

Police start getting heavy as disabled campaigners occupy the central lobby in protest at ILF closure:

Police_ILF_occupation

 

Occupation of central lobby continues:

 

Central_lobby_occupation

Another video, showing police presence… had to use the phone for this as the camera was about to be confiscated.

Join the Independent Living Fund lobby this Wednesday #SaveILF

Lobby details below from Disabled People Against Cuts:

There’s just over a week to go before the government closes the Independent Living Fund – the fund that disabled people use to pay for the extra carer hours that they need to live in their own homes.

Many ILF recipients use their ILF money to pay for the personal assistants who help them get to work and to college and so on. The government’s decision to go ahead and close the ILF makes a complete mockery of claims that government is keen to support disabled people into work and to stay in work. Actually – the government’s decision to go ahead and close the ILF makes a complete mockery of any claims that government is keen to support disabled people in any way at all.

In England, local councils are supposed to pick up the tab for that extra care when the ILF shuts on 30 June. Funding will be devolved to councils for just a year. As has been widely reported, that transferring of responsibility to councils has been a major mess. Some ILF recipients in England have been left to guess whether or not their councils will pay for the care that the ILF covered, especially in an ongoing way.

The #SaveILF Campaign and Disabled People Against Cuts ask all ILF users and campaign supporters to join a final public lobby of MPs this Wednesday to protest at the closure:

11am
Wednesday 24 June
Public Lobby, Houses of Parliament

Video: ILF recipients explain how they use their ILF funding to live in their homes and communities:

We’re all in it together – aren’t we? from Moore Lavan Films on Vimeo.

You must Think Positively about work! Even if work is likely to kill you, etc.

Wonder if/when this will end in a sanction.

Let’s start at the beginning:

On Monday, I headed to over the river for a trip to a North London jobcentre with a guy I call Eddie in these stories. I’ve known Eddie for about a year now, I think. Eddie’s a 51-year-old man with learning difficulties who has been out of work for more than five years. He worked as a kitchen assistant for most of his life, but his last job ended in about 2010. He’s signed on for JSA since. He talks a lot about wanting another job – “I should be going to work now, not going to this stupid place [the jobcentre]” – but it is pretty obvious he’s struggling on that front.

I suppose there are explanations for this, although I get tired of having to cast about for explanations for unemployment. I get sick of having to somehow justify people’s situations when they are out of work. I don’t know people’s entire back stories and I generally don’t want to know. I only know that people are where they are and that most people have been many things by the time they’re 50.

Eddie is getting older and his health isn’t great. He’s diabetic and injects insulin three times a day. He spends a lot of time at his GPs’ surgery, or getting bloods done, or seeing consultants at the hospital. He doesn’t always present well these days: more often than not, he’ll have food down his front of his clothes and tiny sores on his face and he’ll wear the clothes with the foodstains more than once.

He’s become more defensive and cantankerous in the year that I’ve known him. He speaks a non-stop, belligerent stream: he says that his neighbours are noisy drug addicts “up banging on the walls and shouting all night”, jobcentre staff are useless, that the landlord who owns Eddie’s tiny studio flat is hopeless and won’t fix things when they break, and that England was fine until it was ruined by immigrants (Eddie’s parents moved here from Jamaica before he was born. He describes himself, often, as “British born and bred”). He isn’t tragic, or pitiable, or pathetic, or vulnerable. He’s opinionated. He’s tough. He’s been around. He’s older and he’s probably not first choice for hard, low-paid manual work anymore. I’m not entirely sure that he wants to be. He speaks fondly of his working days, but seems to fear a return to the sort of work that he did. Perhaps he feels that he is out of that race now. I would say that he is stressed. He seems to hate change and he fights it. He’s ageing and knows how that is likely to roll. Don’t we all. Getting older probably isn’t so terrible if you’ve got golf and good health. It’s another story when you’re at the GP a lot, but still expected to grind your last working years out in a kitchen for £7 an hour (if you’re lucky), or for your JSA (if you’re not). I know we’re all supposed to be grateful for the chance to slog at hard manual jobs for stuff-all money until we drop dead, but I can see why someone would rather not. I would rather not myself. The older you get, the less you’d rather. “I could do that work in the big kitchens when I was younger,” Eddie said to me last Thursday when we went to have a coffee after his JSA signon appointment. “I couldn’t do that now.”

Continue reading

And so the DWP washes its hands of the Independent Living Fund meltdown…

There are now just two weeks left until the Independent Living Fund closes. What a shambles this closure is.

The ILF is a fund that severely disabled people use to pay for the extra carer hours they need to live independent lives. But never mind that: the government will close the ILF on 30 June – a monumentally unpopular and unnecessary decision which disabled campaigners have fought since the closure was announced in 2012. With just two weeks to go, the thing is in meltdown. Some ILF recipients in England still don’t know if their councils will pay for the care that the ILF covered, especially in an ongoing way (ILF funding in England will be devolved to local authorities for just a year). You can imagine the distress this is causing disabled people and their families. You can read about that here and here.

This 30 June closure was a coalition government decision out of the DWP, but you can forget about that lot taking responsibility for the distress and the mess. Government and the DWP have already washed their hands of it. The official line is that any problems with the ILF closure in England – and there are plenty, as I say – belong firmly to councils. We may as well note this for the record.

I asked the DWP about support it could offer to people who still hadn’t alternative care packages in place by 30 June, or who still didn’t know what would happen to their care when the ILF closed. The DWP didn’t quite say Don’t Bore Us With That, but it might as well have: from 30 June, the department said, “sole responsibility” in England for “former-ILF user” care lay with councils. No point making calls to the department in the meantime, either: “Any ILF user who has concerns about future funding from their local authority should contact the local authority directly.” Not Our Problem, in other words. Government has left the building. Disabled people and councils have been left to fight it out.

Disabled People Against Cuts and supporters will lobby MPs about the ILF closure on 24 June. Details here.

Video: Corrie stars back the Independent Living Fund:

Video: Disabled campaigners occupy Westminster Abbey in June 2014 to protest government plans to close the Independent Living Fund:

Picture: police stand on tents to stop disabled people setting up a Save The Independent Living Fund protest camp at Westminster Abbey last year.

Police standing on tents

Video: Independent Living Fund recipient Gabriel Pepper explains why he needs the extra carer hours that the ILF pays for. Gabriel has had three brain tumours. He is one of the ILF recipients who still isn’t sure if his council will meet all his care needs after 30 June.

 

More IDS bollocks: getting rid of Disability Employment Advisers at jobcentres

Is this the beginning of the end of Disability Employment Advisers at jobcentres?

Last week, I went to a North London jobcentre with a disabled man who was meeting with an adviser to agree his claimant commitment – the contract which sets out the number of jobs this man will search for each week and so on. We met with the Disability Employment Adviser.

A bit of background: DEAs are onsite jobcentre officers who are trained to support disabled JSA claimants and to direct disabled people towards disability-friendly employers (assuming that such employers still exist). Meetings with DEAs can be hard to come by, presumably because DEAs are in demand and a lot of disabled people need their support. The man I was with had waited well over a month for the appointment that finally took place last week. It was a relief to get to that meeting and to begin to set up the relationship with the DEA. Disability Employment Advisers can sometimes act as a kind of buffer between disabled people and sanctions. They note if someone has learning or literacy difficulties, or other problems that make jobsearching hard. DEAs are not always perfect, but they’re better than nothing. A relationship of some kind can be helpful.

Except – there’s not going to be a relationship of any sort with this DEA, or any DEA at this jobcentre. It seems there’s not going to be a DEA there at all. It emerged that this DEA was leaving in a few weeks and that the job would not be filled. “I’m not going to be doing this job for too much longer and they’re not replacing my role,” the DEA told us. This person said that there would be no DEA at this jobcentre “as far as I am aware.” The guy I was with was a bit shocked to hear this. He’d previously signed on at at a Northeast London jobcentre where the DEA working there had probably saved him from sanctions a couple of times. That DEA understood his literacy problems and knew that he struggled with online jobsearching, because he couldn’t easily use a computer or email. Things weren’t great at that jobcentre and the DEA certainly had ups and downs, but the overall picture would have been a lot worse without that person there and generally onside. Continue reading